Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/birol91/quorum-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-software-sw-unit-verification-engineer-aspice40)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-software-sw-unit-verification-engineer-aspice40"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-software-sw-unit-verification-engineer-aspice40/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-software-sw-unit-verification-engineer-aspice40"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/birol91/quorum-agents/automotive-software-sw-unit-verification-engineer-aspice40.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00992 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00397 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
software-sw-unit-verification-engineer-aspice40 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 167 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 0602635054a1
software-sw-unit-verification-engineer-aspice40 is an agent published in the GitHub repository birol91/quorum-agents (0 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 992 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-engineer
Use this agent when tests need to be written, debugged, or improved. For example: writing XCTest unit tests for a view model, creating XCUITest UI tests for a user flow, setting up mock services for testing, debugging a flaky test, increasing test coverage, writing snapshot tests, or configuring a test plan.
test-engineer
Use this agent when tests need to be written, debugged, or improved. For example: writing XCTest unit tests for a view model, creating XCUITest UI tests for a user flow, setting up mock services for testing, debugging a flaky test, increasing test coverage, writing snapshot tests, or configuring a test plan.
Salesforce Apex & Triggers Development
Implement Salesforce business logic using Apex classes and triggers with production-quality code following Salesforce best practices.
tester
Test writing (unit, integration, e2e). Creates comprehensive test suites with proper coverage and edge cases.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.
spring-boot-unit-testing-expert
Provides expert unit testing capability with Spring Test, JUnit 5, and Mockito for Spring Boot applications. Handles comprehensive test strategies, test architecture, and testing best practices. Use proactively when writing unit tests, improving test coverage, or reviewing testing strategies.