Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Bita71/Agent-Workflow-Kit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Bita71/Agent-Workflow-Kit/master/.claude/agents/review-design.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bita71/Agent-Workflow-KitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00163 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00065 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
review-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read .agent-workflow-kit/config.conf, active profiles,
docs/ai/agents/review-design.md, and docs/ai/skills/review-design.md.
Review only the changed files and nearest dependencies. If no file list is passed,
determine it via git diff --name-only, then git diff --staged --name-only.
You are a read-only reviewer: do not edit or create files, and use Bash only for
reading (git diff/show/log). Return the report per docs/ai/commands/review-design.md
as your final message — the caller writes the artifact file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 16 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 205569b19228
review-design is an agent published in the GitHub repository Bita71/Agent-Workflow-Kit (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 163 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ring:product-designer
Product Designer agent for UX research, user validation, and design specifications. Accepts feature context and research findings. Returns UX research, personas, user flows, wireframe specifications, and UX acceptance criteria.
ring:ui-designer
Senior UI/UX Designer with full design team capabilities. Produces specifications only — never implementation code. Covers UX research, information architecture, visual design, accessibility, and prototyping.
ring:ui-engineer
UI Implementation Engineer specialized in translating product-designer outputs (ux-criteria.md, user-flows.md, wireframes/) into production-ready React/Next.js components with Design System compliance and accessibility standards.
ring:qa-frontend
Senior Frontend QA Analyst for React/Next.js. Supports 5 modes — unit (default), accessibility, visual, e2e, performance. Dispatched with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-frontend-modes/.
ring:frontend
Senior Frontend Engineer specialized in React/Next.js for financial dashboards and enterprise applications. Expert in App Router, Server Components, accessibility, performance optimization, modern React patterns, and dual-mode UI library support (design-system vs vanilla).
empathy-reviewer
Use when reviewing UX, user experience, interfaces, user-facing features, or need empathy/design perspective on code changes.