Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bita71/Agent-Workflow-KitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00163 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
review-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read .agent-workflow-kit/config.conf, active profiles,
docs/ai/agents/review-design.md, and docs/ai/skills/review-design.md.
Review only the changed files and nearest dependencies. If no file list is passed,
determine it via git diff --name-only, then git diff --staged --name-only.
You are a read-only reviewer: do not edit or create files, and use Bash only for
reading (git diff/show/log). Return the report per docs/ai/commands/review-design.md
as your final message — the caller writes the artifact file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 16 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 205569b19228
review-design is an agent published in the GitHub repository Bita71/Agent-Workflow-Kit (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 163 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-design-critic
Critique UI/visual design artefacts on hierarchy, contrast, alignment, consistency, and intent. Trigger per design review pass.
ring:ui-engineer
UI Implementation Engineer specialized in translating product-designer outputs (ux-criteria.md, user-flows.md, wireframes/) into production-ready React/Next.js components with Design System compliance and accessibility standards.
figma-accept
Figma UI 还原验收者（只读）。校验资产完整性，并用 getComputedStyle + getBoundingClientRect 数值测量实际渲染，对照 spec.json 算 delta，输出结构化证据报告。不修改代码。栈无关。 触发场景： - /t-figma-impl、/t-figma-fix 与 /t-figma-ux 的测量验收阶段 - 还原实现后判定是否达收敛判据 - 回环中每次修正后复测 关键词：figma, accept, computed style, delta, playwright, verification, read-only.
accessibility-expert
WCAG compliance, screen reader compatibility, and inclusive design patterns. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y issues, or designing inclusive UIs.
ux-craftsman
UI/UX excellence authority. Invoke for design system creation, visual craft, interaction design, wireframing, accessibility design audit, responsive layouts, and design quality review. Produces stunning interfaces and design findings — prioritizes visual excellence and user experience.
frontend-design
React 前端技术设计专家。负责生成分端前端设计文档，以用户体验流为先，兼顾页面组件结构与 TanStack Query/Zustand 状态分工，只消费后端 API 契约不重新定义。.