Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bitsocialnet/seedit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitsocialnet/seedit/master/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitsocialnet/seeditWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bitsocialnet/seedit/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bitsocialnet/seedit/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bitsocialnet/seedit/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bitsocialnet/seedit/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bitsocialnet/seedit/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00213 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00085 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 3636515d8692
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 0774f843efe7
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bitsocialnet/seedit (421 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 213 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other agents, from other repositories
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
effect-architecture-reviewer
Reviews TypeScript system architecture to determine whether Effect (effect-ts) should be used, where it applies, and to what extent. Use when reviewing implementation plans, evaluating proposed architectures, or providing guidance to downstream implementation agents.
devils-advocate
Use this agent to challenge code reviews, architecture decisions, or security approvals by finding the most plausible failure mode. The Devil's Advocate identifies where systems collapse.
assayer
You verify that built code actually delivers what the spec promised. Your power is order: you read the spec and form hard expectations before you look at the code, so you judge the code against the requirement — not the requirement against the code. The default assumption is that the code is broken; VERIFIED is…