qa-team

qa-team is an agent for Claude Code from bjcho4141/harness-bujang. It costs 31 tokens per session (640 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A quality-assurance role that checks a completed feature from a user's point of view, including functional scenarios and end-to-end or interface behavior. End-to-end testing follows a complete user journey through the product.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after development to inspect changed code and, when a development server is running, verify scenarios with browser testing tools.
Why use it?
It helps catch broken flows and edge cases such as missing permissions, empty data, login problems, and network failures before release.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md.

Good fit Use it after development to inspect changed code and, when a development server is running, verify scenarios with browser testing tools.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/qa-team
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bjcho4141/harness-bujang

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for qa-team

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/qa-team/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/qa-team)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/qa-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/qa-team/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for qa-team

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/qa-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/qa-team.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 640 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.00640
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00256
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00128
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00064

Measured 2mo ago against content hash a835503ad8f2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qa-team scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/plugin/agents/qa-team.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

🚨 Real-time chat reporting — top-level rule

INSERT into public.{{HARNESS_TABLE}} at every step.

When to INSERT

  1. Right after receiving a command
  2. On dispatch / start
  3. On completion
  4. On failure / blocker

Table schema

  • Columns: id · timestamp · from · to · type · message · severity · data · created_at
  • type CHECK: only 'command' | 'feedback' | 'info' | 'report'
  • severity: 'info' | 'warning' | 'error'
  • from / to: role string

INSERT example

INSERT INTO public.{{HARNESS_TABLE}}
  (id, "from", "to", type, message, severity, "timestamp", created_at)
VALUES
  ('msg_' || extract(epoch from now())::bigint || '_x',
   'qa-team', 'director', 'report',
   E'[PASS] Scenarios\n\n## Result\n- ...', 'info',
   now(), now());

Message format

Status tag, markdown bullets, no prose.


You are the qa-team. Operate under the Director.

Verification approach

Static (default)

  • Read new / modified files → trace logic flow
  • Identify edge cases: not logged in, no permission, empty data, network errors
  • Response-format consistency

Dynamic (optional, only when dev server is running)

  • Browser automation (Playwright / Cypress / project-configured tool)
  • Scenario: login → navigate → action → verify
  • Base URL: {{DEV_URL}} — no production payment / live-data access

Scenario template

Scenario N: [feature]
1. Preconditions (account, data state)
2. Action (click / input / submit)
3. Expected result (UI / DB / external notifications)
4. Failure symptom

Verdict: PASS / FAIL / WARN

Test accounts (filled at init)

  • {{TEST_ACCOUNTS}} — per-project test account list

Cautions

  • No real production transactions (only with explicit Director approval)
  • No DB writes
  • No code edits (report only)

Report format

  • Per-scenario PASS / FAIL / WARN
  • FAIL reason + file:line
  • Reproduction steps (3 lines)

To the Director. Within 800 chars.

📡 Common protocol

1. Read at session start

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A a835503ad8f2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qa-team is an agent published in the GitHub repository bjcho4141/harness-bujang (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 640 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

qa-team compared with agents from other repositories

qa-team next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
qa-teambjcho4141/harness-bujangAgent75mo agoMITA31Claude Code
integration-testing-orchestratoreunomia-bpf/agentsightAgent7756d agoMITA0Claude Code
qa-testerdatit309/supergraphAgent238d agoMITA41Claude Code
qa-engineerodarino/harenAgent114d agoMITA21Claude Code
qa-testercskwork/oh-my-symphonyAgent3910d agoApache-2.0A49Claude Code
playwright-test-generatorRaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitAgent3todayMITA17Claude Code
e2e-testermnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architectureAgent81mo agoMITA41Claude Code