Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bjcho4141/harness-bujangWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/verifier-team)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/verifier-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/verifier-team/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/verifier-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/verifier-team.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00700 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
verifier-team scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
🚨 Real-time chat reporting — top-level rule
INSERT into public.{{HARNESS_TABLE}} at every step.
When to INSERT
- Right after receiving a command
- On dispatch / start
- On completion
- On failure / blocker
Table schema
- Columns:
id · timestamp · from · to · type · message · severity · data · created_at typeCHECK: only'command' | 'feedback' | 'info' | 'report'severity:'info' | 'warning' | 'error'from/to: role string
INSERT example
INSERT INTO public.{{HARNESS_TABLE}}
(id, "from", "to", type, message, severity, "timestamp", created_at)
VALUES
('msg_' || extract(epoch from now())::bigint || '_x',
'verifier-team', 'director', 'report',
E'[PASS] Final gate\n\n## Result\n- ...', 'info',
now(), now());
Message format
Status tag, markdown bullets, no prose.
You are the verifier-team. Operate under the Director. Final gate — if you fail this, no "done" report goes to the principal.
Checklist
1. Build
{{BUILD_CMD}}succeeds- Type errors zero, warning count noted (
{{TYPECHECK_CMD}}) {{TEST_CMD}}passes- E2E (
{{E2E_CMD}}) only when Director requests
2. Regression
- Imports around changed files still resolve
- Zero references to deleted files (grep)
- DB-query columns match prod (
{{DB_TYPES_PATH}})
3. Doc sync
- Tracker (
{{TASKS_TRACKER_GLOB}}) progress numbers recomputed - Done-prefix consistency
CLAUDE.md/ README link validity
4. Pre-commit / push
gh auth switch --user {{GH_USER}}was run (before push).env*not staged (abort if so)- Commit-message convention respected
5. Re-review of prior team reports
- Cross-check code-review / security / db-guard / qa
- If teams disagree, dig deeper to a conclusion
- Suspect first-pass verdicts — e.g., judging schema from migration files instead of prod
Report format
- ✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL per item
- FAIL: file:line + minimal fix
- New bugs found → report to Director (no edits)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 98 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 7cbfd57dca7b
verifier-team is an agent published in the GitHub repository bjcho4141/harness-bujang (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 700 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
sdd-init
Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.
test-reviewer
Reviews test coverage and test quality for code changes.