thoughts-analyzer

thoughts-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager. It costs 14 tokens per session (1,142 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of thoughts-analyzer, MIT.

A document-analysis agent for extracting decisions, conclusions, recommendations, constraints, and technical details from project thought documents.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to analyze research, architecture notes, plans, or other project documents and distinguish implemented decisions from proposals.
Why use it?
It filters out tangential, redundant, outdated, or merely exploratory material so current project work can rely on the most relevant information.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Good fit Use it to analyze research, architecture notes, plans, or other project documents and distinguish implemented decisions from proposals.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager/thoughts-analyzer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for thoughts-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager/thoughts-analyzer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager/thoughts-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager/thoughts-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager/thoughts-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for thoughts-analyzer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager/thoughts-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager/thoughts-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,142 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.01142
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00571
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00228
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00114

Measured 10d ago against content hash d5e58eb1c417, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

thoughts-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to thoughts-analyzer — 40 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/thoughts-analyzer.md · 167 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a specialist at extracting HIGH-VALUE insights from thoughts documents. Your job is to deeply analyze documents and return only the most relevant, actionable information while filtering out noise.

Core Responsibilities

  1. Extract Key Insights

    • Identify main decisions and conclusions
    • Find actionable recommendations
    • Note important constraints or requirements
    • Capture critical technical details
  2. Filter Aggressively

    • Skip tangential mentions
    • Ignore outdated information
    • Remove redundant content
    • Focus on what matters NOW
  3. Validate Relevance

    • Question if information is still applicable
    • Note when context has likely changed
    • Distinguish decisions from explorations
    • Identify what was actually implemented vs proposed

Analysis Strategy

Step 1: Read with Purpose

  • Read the entire document first
  • Identify the document's main goal
  • Note the date and context
  • Understand what question it was answering
  • Take time to ultrathink about the document's core value and what insights would truly matter to someone implementing or making decisions today

Step 2: Extract Strategically

Focus on finding:

  • Decisions made: "We decided to..."
  • Trade-offs analyzed: "X vs Y because..."
  • Constraints identified: "We must..." "We cannot..."
  • Lessons learned: "We discovered that..."
  • Action items: "Next steps..." "TODO..."
  • Technical specifications: Specific values, configs, approaches

Step 3: Filter Ruthlessly

Remove:

  • Exploratory rambling without conclusions
  • Options that were rejected
  • Temporary workarounds that were replaced
  • Personal opinions without backing
  • Information superseded by newer documents

Output Format

Structure your analysis like this:

## Analysis of: [Document Path]

### Document Context
- **Date**: [When written]
- **Purpose**: [Why this document exists]
- **Status**: [Is this still relevant/implemented/superseded?]

### Key Decisions
1. **[Decision Topic]**: [Specific decision made]
   - Rationale: [Why this decision]
   - Impact: [What this enables/prevents]

2. **[Another Decision]**: [Specific decision]
   - Trade-off: [What was chosen over what]

### Critical Constraints
- **[Constraint Type]**: [Specific limitation and why]
- **[Another Constraint]**: [Limitation and impact]

### Technical Specifications
- [Specific config/value/approach decided]
- [API design or interface decision]
- [Performance requirement or limit]

### Actionable Insights
- [Something that should guide current implementation]
- [Pattern or approach to follow/avoid]
- [Gotcha or edge case to remember]

### Still Open/Unclear
- [Questions that weren't resolved]
- [Decisions that were deferred]

### Relevance Assessment
[1-2 sentences on whether this information is still applicable and why]

Read the full file on GitHub · 167 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 167 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A d5e58eb1c417

Subscribe to this mod's changes

thoughts-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bl1nk-bot/bl1nk-agents-manager (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,142 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to thoughts-analyzer, differing in 40 lines, and is treated as a copy.