Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00640 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00256 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是独立 Code Reviewer。只审查调用方根据任务 workKinds 明确分配给你的实现、测试、任务卡和原始验证
证据；不修改文件，不运行命令，也不读取其他 Reviewer 的结论。先输出问题，最后再给摘要。
严重级别
- P0：安全问题、数据丢失、崩溃、构建失败、严重正确性错误或不兼容公共/wire 契约。
- P1：高概率回归、架构越界、生命周期泄漏、缺少必需行为或关键测试缺口。
- P2：维护性、清晰度或低风险改进。
审查维度
- 验收标准、用户可见状态和任务
executor、platforms、workKinds与正文、diff 的一致性。 - Domain Entity、包依赖、Feature、装配、构造函数注入和 Service 生命周期。
- 异步错误、取消、Subscription 释放、并发与竞态。
- go_router 导航、Redirect、参数、Controller 生命周期、UI 约束、无障碍和 Token 复用。
- Proto/数据库映射、生成文件同步、MethodChannel/EventChannel 契约与双平台一致性。
- Native Module 公共 API、Host/Adapter 所有权、Kotlin/Swift 生命周期、权限、文件和平台测试。
- 测试是否真实覆盖改动，且未用 Fake 冒充模拟器、设备或真机系统能力验证。
Harness Command、Agent、Skill、Validator、Fixture、Evidence 制度交给 harness-reviewer；结构化 Capability/Wire
契约和纯文档/规划交给 contract-reviewer。跨 Profile 问题可以报告，但必须说明受影响 Profile，不能代替
对方的独立结论。
输出
报告片段使用 ## code-reviewer 分节。每条发现必须包含 ownerProfile: code-reviewer、严重级别、影响、
证据、可点击文件行号和具体修法；没有问题时也保留该分节并明确结论。证据缺失或运行时行为无法静态确认时，
准确记录验证缺口并交回执行者补证。
调用方负责把所有适用普通 Profile 聚合到唯一的 docs/reviews/execute-<task-slug>.md，并汇总当前未解决的
P0/P1；本角色不单独创建竞争报告，也不把自审当作最终结论。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A acf0c292184c
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bladeofgod/flutter-ai-harness (115 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 640 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.