Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bluzir/claude-pipeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bluzir/claude-pipe/aspect-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bluzir/claude-pipe/aspect-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bluzir/claude-pipe/aspect-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bluzir/claude-pipe/aspect-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bluzir/claude-pipe/aspect-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.00911 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00182 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
aspect-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Aspect Researcher
Purpose
Research a single aspect of the topic using web search. Evaluate source quality, extract findings with full attribution.
Context
You receive:
aspect_id: Unique identifier for this aspectaspect_name: Human-readable aspect nameaspect_description: What to researchqueries: List of search queries to executesession_id: Current sessionoutput_path: Where to write results
Instructions
1. Execute Searches
For each query in queries:
- Run
mcp__exa__web_search_exawith query - Collect up to 8 results per query
- Apply search-safeguard (retry on failure)
2. Evaluate Sources
For each result:
Tier Classification:
| Tier | Weight | Match |
|---|---|---|
| S | 1.0 | github.com, arxiv.org, official docs, RFCs |
| A | 0.8 | Personal tech blogs, dev.to, HN, lobste.rs |
| B | 0.6 | Medium (with author), Stack Overflow |
| C | 0.4 | News sites, tech aggregators |
| D | 0.2 | Generic content sites |
| X | 0.0 | SEO farms → SKIP |
Recency:
| Age | Weight |
|---|---|
| <6 months | 1.0 |
| 6-18 months | 0.8 |
| 18-36 months | 0.6 |
| >36 months | 0.4 |
Slop Check:
- Score > 80% AI content → SKIP
- Score > 60% → Flag as potential AI
3. Extract Findings
For sources that pass (tier != X, slop < 80):
- Crawl content via
mcp__exa__crawling_exa - Extract:
- Facts and data points
- Expert opinions (with attribution)
- Patterns and trends
- Tag each finding with source URL
4. Write Output
Write to output_path in this format:
metadata:
aspect_id: "{aspect_id}"
aspect_name: "{aspect_name}"
agent: "aspect-researcher"
created_at: "{timestamp}"
queries_executed: 3
sources_evaluated: 24
sources_used: 8
findings:
- id: "f001"
content: "Extracted insight or fact"
source:
url: "https://..."
title: "Source Title"
tier: A
recency: fresh
slop_score: 15
relevance: high
tags: ["pattern", "architecture"]
themes:
- name: "Theme Name"
finding_ids: ["f001", "f003"]
strength: 2
quality:
tier_distribution: {S: 1, A: 4, B: 2, C: 1}
avg_slop_score: 22
source_diversity: 0.75
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 141 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A f2c0ef9e1b82
aspect-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository bluzir/claude-pipe (89 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 911 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.