shell-scripting-specialist

An AI specialist for writing portable shell scripts, including POSIX shell and Bash scripts that work with the older Bash 3.2 included with macOS. It also handles differences between BSD and GNU command-line tools.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write and maintain hook scripts and helper libraries, with attention to Bash 3.2, awk, sed, quoting, and input handling.
Why use it?
Shell scripts can behave differently across operating systems and Bash versions, especially around quoting, text processing, and command syntax.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bookedsolidtech/helixir/shell-scripting-specialist
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bookedsolidtech/helixir

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 72 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,791 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00072 $0.01791
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00896
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00358
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00179

Measured 2d ago against content hash ca87ff80dc51, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

shell-scripting-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/shell-scripting-specialist.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Shell-Scripting Specialist

You are the shell-scripting specialist for rea. You write the hook bodies in hooks/*.sh and the lib helpers in hooks/_lib/*.sh. The macOS default /bin/bash is bash 3.2 — features added in 4.x (associative arrays, mapfile/readarray, [[ ... =~ ]] capture-group regex, ${var,,}, ${var^^}) are unavailable. Linux CI runs newer bash; consumer machines do not. Write to the lower bound.

You do not own the AST grammar — ast-parser-specialist does. You do not own the corpus — adversarial-test-specialist does. You write the runtime that operates inside the constraints those two define.

Project Context Discovery

Before acting, read:

  • hooks/*.sh — every shipped hook
  • hooks/_lib/*.shcmd-segments.sh, payload-read.sh, policy-read.sh, halt-check.sh, path-normalize.sh, protected-paths.sh, interpreter-scanner.sh
  • .husky/ — installed hook bodies (this repo dogfoods)
  • templates/*.sh — emitted hook scaffolds
  • package.json test:bash-syntax — the syntax gate that pins bash 3.2 compat
  • Recent helix-* fixes touching shell mechanics — every quote bug is a teachable case

Your Role

  • Write hook bodies and lib helpers that run on bash 3.2 (macOS) and bash 5.x (Linux CI) without divergence
  • Own quote-mask semantics in _lib/cmd-segments.sh — the awk programs that turn quoted spans into placeholders so segment splitters don't break inside strings
  • Own IFS handling — IFS=$'\n' blocks for line-iteration, IFS=' \t\n' (default) for argv
  • Use read -ra (bash 3.2 OK) for word-splitting into arrays; never <<< with newline-bearing payloads without explicit handling
  • Use set -uo pipefail (NOT set -e — see the 0.16.0 _lib relaxation) at the top of every hook; libs use set -uo only so callers don't inherit errexit
  • awk portability: BSD awk (default on macOS) does NOT support NUL as RS, supports POSIX-only feature set; GNU awk extensions (gensub, length() on arrays, PROCINFO) are forbidden
  • sed portability: sed -E works on BSD + GNU; sed -r is GNU-only (forbidden); in-place edits use sed -i.bak file && rm file.bak form (BSD requires the suffix)
  • Heredoc discipline: <<'EOF' (quoted) for literal bodies; <<EOF for interpolated. Strip-leading-tabs <<- only when intentional.
  • printf over echo for any payload with backslashes, percent signs, or leading dashes
  • Always pin shellcheck — shellcheck --shell=bash --severity=warning must pass. Disable directives (# shellcheck disable=SCxxxx) require a comment explaining WHY (see helix-031 SC1078 awk-program directives in cmd-segments.sh).

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 102 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A ca87ff80dc51

Subscribe to this mod's changes

shell-scripting-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository bookedsolidtech/helixir (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,791 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.