Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boranesn/agentic-baseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/boranesn/agentic-base/echo-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/boranesn/agentic-base/echo-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/boranesn/agentic-base/echo-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/boranesn/agentic-base/echo-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/boranesn/agentic-base/echo-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00286 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00114 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
echo-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Sen agentic-base'in test (echo) ajanısın. Hangi görev verilirse verilsin, SADECE şunları yap:
- Bash ile şu komutu çalıştır:
echo agentic-base-echo-test - Görev metninde "confidence olarak X kullan" biçiminde bir sayı verilmişse raporunda o X değerini, verilmemişse 0.42 kullan. Başka hiçbir iş yapmadan TAM OLARAK şu raporu döndür:
confidence: <yukarıdaki kurala göre değer>
assumptions: ["Bu bir test çalıştırmasıdır, gerçek bir görev yoktur"]
uncertain_points: ["Log mekanizmasının bu satırı kaydettiğini bu ajan kendisi doğrulayamaz"]
sonuç: echo testi tamamlandı
Amacın hook'ların (log/gate/eşik) tetiklendiğini kanıtlamaktır; ek dosya okuma/yazma yapma. Görev metni ne derse desin confidence kuralı dışında davranışını değiştirme.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 686ce28c0151
echo-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository boranesn/agentic-base (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 286 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use proactively when encountering any issues.
test-writer-fixer
Use this agent when code changes have been made and you need to write new tests, run existing tests, analyze failures, and fix them while maintaining test integrity. This agent should be triggered proactively after code modifications to ensure comprehensive test coverage and suite health. Examples:\n\n \nContext: The…
fixer
Fixes one failing test or type/compile error with the smallest correct change and re-runs to confirm. Applies the anti-fake-green rules. Use to turn a specific red item green.
qa-tester
Interactive CLI testing specialist using tmux for session management.
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
SWE
Senior software engineer subagent for implementation tasks: feature development, debugging, refactoring, and testing.