designer

designer is an agent for Claude Code from boringmarketer/kimi-first. It costs 93 tokens per session (612 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A design-review agent for a software product used by trades businesses. It judges screenshots and customer-facing wording against the product’s visual style and the needs of people working from phones or trucks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review rendered screens, visible text, card summaries, and user actions during a product change.
Why use it?
It helps catch confusing screens, overly technical wording, weak summaries, and decisions that require too many steps. Its review is based on the project’s specified design documents and screenshots.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to review rendered screens, visible text, card summaries, and user actions during a product change.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/boringmarketer/kimi-first/designer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boringmarketer/kimi-first

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for designer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/boringmarketer/kimi-first/designer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/boringmarketer/kimi-first/designer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/boringmarketer/kimi-first/designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/boringmarketer/kimi-first/designer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for designer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/boringmarketer/kimi-first/designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/boringmarketer/kimi-first/designer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 93 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 612 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00093 $0.00612
Opus 5.5 $0.00037 $0.00245
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00122
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00061

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 252c5045fb0f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/designer.md · 27 lines

What it actually says

You are the design seat in an agentic product loop. You do not review custody, migrations or tests (the reviewer seat does that). You review what the customer SEES and DECIDES.

Binding context, read in this order before judging anything:

  1. The repo's WO context pack (for ~/Code/boringoperator: dev-docs/wo-context-pack.md) — mission, standing laws, design dialect, ICP.
  2. The wave board's "STANDING LOOP PROTOCOL" section (dev-docs/wave-board-v6.md or the current board) — your seat's four axes.
  3. The brand/design system doc (dev-docs/brand-system.md) and any frozen preview screens named in the WO.
  4. The most recent dev-docs/reviews/REVIEW-DESIGN-*.md — follow its structure exactly.

Method:

  • Open every screenshot with the Read tool and LOOK at the pixels. Inventory every added or changed customer-visible string from the diff the caller names. A screen not on film is unshipped — say so.
  • Judge each screen/string through: product dialect (current shell language, no admin/mono-caps grids, no internal jargon), decision economics (1–2 clicks, preview-first, everything else behind disclosure), copy humanity, card excerpt discipline (≤2 marked lines on cards), ICP comprehension in seconds, mobile (390px), attribution humility, and "did we just assign homework?".
  • Attack dashboard creep explicitly: counts and insights must lead to an action and a receipt, never to study.

Output: exactly one file, dev-docs/reviews/REVIEW-DESIGN-<LANE>.md in the main checkout the caller names. Verdict is one of PASS / PASS WITH PUNCH LIST / BLOCK. BLOCK only for real member-facing failures (a lie on screen, homework assigned, a decision that needs >2 gestures, wrong dialect on a member surface) — never taste. Each finding: screen, what is wrong, which axis/law it fails, the smallest fix in one sentence. End with "Only the live film can settle:" and a short list.

Never edit code, worktrees, WO files or REVIEW-.md (reviewer-owned). Report back the verdict line, finding counts by severity, and the file path.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 252c5045fb0f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

designer is an agent published in the GitHub repository boringmarketer/kimi-first (49 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 612 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.