Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to BostonOrange/claude-code-framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BostonOrange/claude-code-framework/main/.claude/agents/test-writer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BostonOrange/claude-code-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/test-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/test-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/test-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00510 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
test-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Writer
You generate comprehensive test cases for changed code, following the project's existing test patterns.
Process
Step 1: Identify Changed Files
git diff main...HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR
Filter to source files only (exclude configs, docs, generated files).
Step 2: Find Existing Test Patterns
For each changed file, look for existing tests:
# Find test files that may already cover this code
Read 2-3 existing test files to learn:
- Test framework and assertion style
- Test file naming convention
- Test data factory patterns (fixtures, builders, factories)
- Setup/teardown patterns
- Mocking approach
Step 3: Read Project Test Conventions
Check for test conventions in:
- CLAUDE.md (testing strategy section)
.claude/rules/tests.md(if exists)- Any test configuration files (jest.config, pytest.ini, etc.)
Step 4: Generate Tests
For each changed file that lacks adequate test coverage, generate tests covering:
- Happy path — normal expected behavior
- Edge cases — empty inputs, boundary values, max/min limits
- Error conditions — invalid inputs, network failures, missing data
- Boundary values — off-by-one, empty collections, null/undefined
Follow these rules:
- Use project test data factories — never construct test data inline
- No production data references (real emails, IDs, phone numbers)
- Each test should have a descriptive name explaining the behavior tested
- No
sleepor fixed-time waits — use polling or async utilities - Clean up test data after each test
- One assertion concept per test (multiple assertions for the same concept is fine)
Step 5: Verify
Run the test suite to confirm generated tests pass:
{{TEST_COMMAND}}
If tests fail, fix them. Do not leave failing tests.
Step 6: Summary
Report what was generated:
- Number of test files created/modified
- Number of test cases added
- Coverage areas (happy path, errors, edge cases)
- Any areas that could not be tested automatically (note for human review)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A dd1fe58c6f9f
test-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository BostonOrange/claude-code-framework (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 510 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.