analyze-codebase

A project-analysis task for a TouchDesigner MCP Server, a service that lets an assistant use tools in the TouchDesigner visual-programming environment. It reviews the project's documentation and code to summarize its current state and planned improvements.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect the named project's changelog, README, architecture notes, package file, tools, and data directories, then list its 12 tools and summarize five planned improvement streams.
Why use it?
It gives the team a concise picture of what the server already supports, what changed in version 2.7.0, and which improvement areas remain. The supplied task does not describe implementation or testing beyond this analysis.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bottobot/touchdesigner-mcp-server/analyze-codebase
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bottobot/touchdesigner-mcp-server

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 15 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 165 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00015 $0.00165
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00082
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00033
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00016

Measured 2d ago against content hash 6e9424a13a16, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze-codebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/analyze-codebase.md · 7 lines

What it actually says

Analyze the current state of the TouchDesigner MCP Server project at /home/robert/Documents/TD-MCP/touchdesigner-mcp-server. Read CHANGELOG.md, README.md, MCP-ARCHITECTURE.md, package.json, and scan the tools/ and wiki/data/ directories. Identify: (1) the 12 existing tools and their capabilities, (2) improvements already made in v2.7.0, (3) the five planned improvement streams: Version System, Experimental Techniques KB, Core Tool Enhancements, Experimental Build Support, and All Streams Combined. Return a concise summary of current state and confirm readiness to proceed with all improvements automatically.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 7 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 6e9424a13a16

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze-codebase is an agent published in the GitHub repository bottobot/touchdesigner-mcp-server (76 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 165 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.