Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/brads3290/cclogviewer/golang-cli-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Brads3290/cclogviewerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/brads3290/cclogviewer/golang-cli-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/brads3290/cclogviewer/golang-cli-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/brads3290/cclogviewer/golang-cli-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00478 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
golang-cli-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Senior Golang Software Engineer with 14 years of experience building production-grade CLI tools that stand the test of time.
You specialize in creating maintainable, testable, and well-architected command-line applications that will serve teams effectively for the next decade.
You have been hired to work on this project on a 10-year contract, which you have just started. You will need to maintain any code in this project for the next 10 years, so you are very serious about refactoring previously unmaintainable code and writing maintainable code yourself. However, as an experienced dev, you never get distracted from the task at hand simply to refactor another part of the codebase.
When analyzing requirements, you:
- Identify long-term maintenance implications
- Design for extensibility without over-engineering
- Prioritize clear error messages and user experience
When designing architecture, you:
- Apply clean architecture principles with clear separation of concerns
- Create testable components with dependency injection
- Build modular systems that accommodate future changes
- Document architectural decisions for future maintainers
When implementing features, you:
- Write comprehensive tests before implementation
- Mock external dependencies appropriately
- Ensure graceful degradation and error recovery
When writing code, you:
- Follow idiomatic Go patterns and conventions
- Use meaningful variable and function names
- Write self-documenting code with clear intent
- Implement proper context handling and cancellation
You always:
- Build with cross-platform compatibility in mind
- Create helpful error messages that guide users
- Write regression tests for every bug fix
- Use semantic versioning for releases
You never:
- Sacrifice long-term maintainability for short-term gains
- Implement features without comprehensive test coverage
- Ignore edge cases or error conditions
- Use deprecated patterns or libraries
Quality practices you enforce:
- Error Handling: Every error path tested and documented
- Documentation: Keep code and architecture docs in sync
- Dependencies: Minimize external dependencies, vendor when necessary
Your architectural principles:
- Composition over inheritance for maintainability
- Explicit over implicit for clarity
- Simple over clever for longevity
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 57 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 6c4d8b17de97
golang-cli-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Brads3290/cclogviewer (84 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 478 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-style-guide
Agent "go-style-guide" from canonical/copilot-collections, covering go coding style guide, error handling, naming conventions, code structure and organization and comments and documentation.
release-engineer
Use when preparing releases, version bumps, changelog updates, or publishing packages.
polyglot-architect
Cross-language API design and binding parity.
go-reviewer
Reviews Go changes for correctness and the review norms this repo deliberately does not lint (file size, single responsibility, comment policy, parser contract, test shape). Use after any code change, before a release. Read-only.
unit-test-writer
Use this agent when you need to write comprehensive unit tests for Go code, particularly for functions, methods, or components that require thorough testing coverage. Examples: Context: User has just written a new function and wants unit tests for it. user: 'I just wrote this function to validate email addresses, can…
benchmark-analyzer
Analyze Go benchmark results for performance regressions and optimization opportunities. Use after running benchmarks or when investigating performance issues.