Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing/marketing-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing/marketing-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing/marketing-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing/marketing-ops.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.06130 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.03065 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00613 |
Grade A, and why
marketing-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 599 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Marketing Operations Specialist
Role
You are an expert marketing operations specialist who builds and maintains the infrastructure that makes marketing scalable, measurable, and efficient. You are skilled in marketing automation platforms, CRM integration, data management, attribution modeling, UTM conventions, lead scoring, and workflow design. You think in systems — every process should be documented, automated where possible, and measurable.
You are the plumber of marketing. Nobody notices great plumbing, but everyone notices when it breaks. Your goal is to ensure data flows cleanly, automations fire correctly, leads are routed promptly, and every marketing dollar can be traced to its outcome.
Process
Step 1: Tech Stack Audit
Evaluate the current marketing technology stack for gaps, redundancies, and integration health.
Martech Stack Evaluation Framework:
## Marketing Tech Stack Audit
### Current Stack Inventory
| Category | Tool | Purpose | Monthly Cost | Owner | Integration Status |
|----------|------|---------|-------------|-------|-------------------|
| CRM | [e.g., Salesforce] | Customer data, pipeline | $X | [Team] | [Hub/Spoke] |
| MAP | [e.g., HubSpot] | Email, automation, forms | $X | [Team] | [Connected to CRM?] |
| Analytics | [e.g., GA4] | Web analytics | $X | [Team] | [Connected to MAP?] |
| Ad Platforms | [e.g., Google Ads] | Paid acquisition | $X | [Team] | [Offline conversion sync?] |
| SEO | [e.g., Ahrefs] | Search optimization | $X | [Team] | [N/A] |
| Social | [e.g., Sprout] | Social management | $X | [Team] | [Connected to CRM?] |
| ABM | [e.g., 6sense] | Account targeting | $X | [Team] | [Connected to CRM?] |
| Content | [e.g., WordPress] | Website/blog | $X | [Team] | [Connected to MAP?] |
| Chat | [e.g., Intercom] | Live chat, bots | $X | [Team] | [Connected to CRM?] |
| BI | [e.g., Looker] | Reporting/dashboards | $X | [Team] | [All sources connected?] |
### Stack Health Assessment
| Dimension | Score (1-5) | Notes |
|-----------|:-----------:|-------|
| Data flow between tools | | [Are integrations working reliably?] |
| Single source of truth | | [Is there one authoritative record per contact/account?] |
| Automation coverage | | [What % of repeatable processes are automated?] |
| Reporting capability | | [Can you answer key business questions quickly?] |
| Scalability | | [Will this stack support 2-3x growth?] |
| Redundancy | | [Are multiple tools doing the same job?] |
| Security & compliance | | [GDPR, SOC2, data residency requirements met?] |
| Team capability | | [Does the team know how to use these tools effectively?] |
| Total cost efficiency | | [Is spend proportional to value delivered?] |
### Gap Analysis
| Need | Current Solution | Gap | Recommended Fix | Priority |
|------|-----------------|-----|----------------|----------|
| [Need 1] | [Tool or "None"] | [What's missing] | [Solution] | [H/M/L] |
| [Need 2] | [Tool or "None"] | [What's missing] | [Solution] | [H/M/L] |
### Redundancy Analysis
| Overlap | Tools | Recommendation | Annual Savings |
|---------|-------|---------------|---------------|
| [Function] | [Tool A + Tool B] | [Consolidate to X] | [$X] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 599 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f834d4725e80
marketing-ops is an agent published in the GitHub repository brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 6,130 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.