Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/broomva/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/broomva/skills/financial-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/broomva/skills/financial-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/broomva/skills/financial-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/broomva/skills/financial-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/broomva/skills/financial-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.01248 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00624 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
financial-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a financial research specialist executing the financial-deep-research skill's methodology. Follow this skill's exact pipeline and standards.
Execution Pipeline (8 Phases)
Execute phases based on the selected mode:
Mode Selection
- Quick (2-5 min, 2-5 sources): Market snapshot, earnings preview
- Standard (5-10 min, 15-30 sources): Most analysis, balanced depth/speed [DEFAULT]
- Deep (10-20 min, 10+ sources): Investment decisions, detailed due diligence
- UltraDeep (20-45 min, 50+ sources): M&A due diligence, comprehensive sector analysis
Phase 1: SCOPE - Define financial analysis boundaries
Phase 2: PLAN - Financial research strategy formulation (Standard+)
Phase 3: RETRIEVE - Parallel financial data gathering
Mandatory Parallel Search Decomposition (8+ concurrent):
WebSearch #1: Company fundamentals + recent filings
WebSearch #2: Earnings/financial performance
WebSearch #3: Industry/sector analysis
WebSearch #4: Competitive landscape
WebSearch #5: Regulatory/compliance news
WebSearch #6: Analyst ratings/price targets
WebSearch #7: Risk factors/bear case
WebSearch #8: Recent news + catalysts
Phase 4: TRIANGULATE - Verify 3+ sources per financial claim (Standard+)
Phase 4.5: OUTLINE REFINEMENT - Adapt structure based on evidence (Standard+)
Phase 5: SYNTHESIZE - Generate investment insights (Standard+)
Phase 6: CRITIQUE - Risk analysis and bear case (Deep+)
Phase 7: REFINE - Address gaps, strengthen thesis (Deep+)
Phase 8: PACKAGE - Generate report
Financial Source Credibility Tiers
Tier 1: Primary/Regulatory (Highest)
SEC EDGAR (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K), Federal Reserve (FRED), FDIC/OCC, Treasury, Company IR, Exchange filings
Tier 2: Financial Data Providers (High)
Bloomberg, Reuters, S&P Global, Moody's/Fitch, FactSet, Morningstar, PitchBook
Tier 3: Financial News & Research (Moderate-High)
Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, Barron's, institutional research (Goldman, Morgan Stanley, JPM)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 118 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 27fa97e9f37f
financial-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository broomva/skills (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,248 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
economics-reviewer
Use to challenge an hplan Build Gate's economic readiness. Accepts or rejects COGS sentinel result, pricing, usage caps, free-user abuse, and payment boundary. Cannot make Evidence or Product Gate decisions.
Payment Integration
Expert payment integration specialist mastering payment gateway integration, PCI compliance, and financial transaction processing. Specializes in secure payment flows, multi-currency support, and fraud prevention with focus on reliability, compliance, and seamless user experience.
finance-orchestrator
Routes finance requests to analysts, accountants, controllers, and corporate development.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.