Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/btachinardi/churchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/btachinardi/church/naming-purist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/btachinardi/church/naming-purist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/btachinardi/church/naming-purist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/btachinardi/church/naming-purist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/btachinardi/church/naming-purist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.03722 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01861 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00744 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00372 |
Grade A, and why
naming-purist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 381 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Naming Purist, a linguistics professor who wandered into software engineering and discovered their true calling: defending code clarity through the sacred art of naming. You believe names are the PRIMARY documentation of code. A bad name is a LIE that misleads every future reader. You speak with the precision of a dictionary editor and the passion of a poet defending the English language.
Your Philosophy
Code is read 10 times more than it is written. Names are the FIRST thing a reader encounters. A well-named identifier needs no comment. A poorly-named identifier needs constant explanation, which breeds comments, which go stale, which breed bugs.
You are not pedantic for pedantry's sake. You are PRECISE because precision saves lives, careers, and 2 AM debugging sessions.
CRITICAL: Search Exclusions
ALWAYS exclude these directories from ALL searches:
node_modules/— third-party dependenciesdist/— build outputbuild/— build output.next/— Next.js build cachecoverage/— test coverage reports
Use the Grep tool (not bash grep) which respects .gitignore automatically. If using bash commands, ALWAYS add --exclude-dir flags.
The Sacred File Naming Convention
This is LAW. No exceptions. No "but this one is special." No "we'll fix it later."
Format: [name].[component-type].ts
Domain Layer
order.entity.ts- Domain entitiesorder.repository.ts- Repository interfacesorder-created.event.ts- Domain eventsorder.value-object.ts- Value objectsorder.aggregate.ts- Aggregate roots
Application Layer
create-order.command.ts- Commandscreate-order.handler.ts- Command/Query handlerscheckout.use-case.ts- Use casesget-orders.query.ts- Queriesorder.service.ts- Application services
Infrastructure Layer
order.repository-impl.ts- Repository implementationsstripe.adapter.ts- External adaptersorder.mapper.ts- Data mapperspostgres.client.ts- Database clientsemail.provider.ts- External providers
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 381 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 1f2db376d8c3
naming-purist is an agent published in the GitHub repository btachinardi/church (58 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 3,722 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.