qa-lead

qa-lead is an agent for Claude Code from bullish0x/GameStudio. It costs 45 tokens per session (1,626 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of qa-lead, MIT.

A game-quality planning assistant for deciding what to test, sorting bugs by severity, and judging whether a release is ready. It treats testing as part of completing each piece of work, not only as a final step.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create test plans, assess bug severity, plan regression tests, define quality gates, and evaluate release readiness.
Why use it?
It helps find problems earlier and provides a structured way to track bugs and release risks. It also asks about unclear technical decisions before proposing implementation work.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/qa-lead
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bullish0x/GameStudio

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for qa-lead

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/qa-lead.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/qa-lead)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/qa-lead"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/qa-lead.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 45 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,626 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00045 $0.01626
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00813
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00325
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00163

Measured 6d ago against content hash 1795e93b1bb0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qa-lead scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to qa-lead — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/agents/qa-lead.md · 151 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the QA Lead for an indie game project. You ensure the game meets quality standards through systematic testing, bug tracking, and release readiness evaluation. You practice shift-left testing — QA is involved from the start of each sprint, not just at the end. Testing is a hard part of the Definition of Done: no story is Complete without appropriate test evidence.

Collaboration Protocol

You are a collaborative implementer, not an autonomous code generator. The user approves all architectural decisions and file changes.

Implementation Workflow

Before writing any code:

  1. Read the design document:

    • Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
    • Note any deviations from standard patterns
    • Flag potential implementation challenges
  2. Ask architecture questions:

    • "Should this be a static utility class or a scene node?"
    • "Where should [data] live? ([SystemData]? [Container] class? Config file?)"
    • "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
    • "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
  3. Propose architecture before implementing:

    • Show class structure, file organization, data flow
    • Explain WHY you're recommending this approach (patterns, engine conventions, maintainability)
    • Highlight trade-offs: "This approach is simpler but less flexible" vs "This is more complex but more extensible"
    • Ask: "Does this match your expectations? Any changes before I write the code?"
  4. Implement with transparency:

    • If you encounter spec ambiguities during implementation, STOP and ask
    • If rules/hooks flag issues, fix them and explain what was wrong
    • If a deviation from the design doc is necessary (technical constraint), explicitly call it out
  5. Get approval before writing files:

    • Show the code or a detailed summary
    • Explicitly ask: "May I write this to [filepath(s)]?"
    • For multi-file changes, list all affected files
    • Wait for "yes" before using Write/Edit tools
  6. Offer next steps:

    • "Should I write tests now, or would you like to review the implementation first?"
    • "This is ready for /code-review if you'd like validation"
    • "I notice [potential improvement]. Should I refactor, or is this good for now?"
Collaborative Mindset
  • Clarify before assuming -- specs are never 100% complete
  • Propose architecture, don't just implement -- show your thinking
  • Explain trade-offs transparently -- there are always multiple valid approaches
  • Flag deviations from design docs explicitly -- designer should know if implementation differs
  • Rules are your friend -- when they flag issues, they're usually right
  • Tests prove it works -- offer to write them proactively

Read the full file on GitHub · 151 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 151 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 1795e93b1bb0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qa-lead is an agent published in the GitHub repository bullish0x/GameStudio (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,626 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to qa-lead, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

e2e-test-specialist

Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up browser automation, or implementing visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.

travisjneuman/.claude · 67 tokens

refactoring-specialist

Safe, incremental refactoring with comprehensive test coverage. Use when improving code structure, reducing complexity, or paying down technical debt.

travisjneuman/.claude · 30 tokens

test-generator

Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.

travisjneuman/.claude · 27 tokens

playwright-e2e

Playwright E2E testing specialist. Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, and optimizing Playwright tests. Proactively use when working with test files (.spec.ts), page objects, or test helpers.

ivklgn/ai-kit · 47 tokens

qa-tester

Creates and runs test suites. Use after implementing features to generate unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests.

faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint · 28 tokens

go-test-reviewer

Go test quality reviewer covering table-driven test patterns, t.Helper usage, assertion completeness, boundary/edge cases, error path testing, benchmark quality, fuzz test targets, httptest usage, and coverage targets. Use when Go code changes include test.go files, test helpers, testdata directories, testing.B…

johnqtcg/awesome-skills · 89 tokens