claude_everything: Agent for Claude Code

.kiro/agents/security-reviewer.md

security-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code, Kiro from burgebj/claude_everything. It costs 52 tokens per session (979 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of security-reviewer, MIT.

A security review for web-application code that looks for vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, unsafe input handling, broken access controls, and risky dependencies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after adding code for user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data to check issues such as injection, SSRF, insecure cryptography, and OWASP Top 10 risks.
Why use it?
It helps catch common security problems before code handling users, accounts, APIs, or sensitive data reaches production.

Agent for Claude CodeKiro

Written for Claude Code and Kiro: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also installed under .kiro/.

This is burgebj/claude_everything's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Kiro how to work on claude_everything itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude_everything configures →

Part of the everything-claude-code plugin — 37 skills, 5 commands, 16 agents shipped together

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to burgebj/claude_everything. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/burgebj/claude_everything/ecc-tools/everything-claude-code-1775042279843/.kiro/agents/security-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/burgebj/claude_everything

Made for: Claude Code, Kiro.

Or install everything-claude-code, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 37 skills, 5 commands, 16 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/burgebj/claude_everything/security-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/burgebj/claude_everything/security-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/burgebj/claude_everything/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/burgebj/claude_everything/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/burgebj/claude_everything/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/burgebj/claude_everything/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 979 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.00979
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00392
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00196
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00098

Measured 1mo ago against content hash acb3fee8ccec, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

| `fetch(userProvidedUrl)` | HIGH | Whitelist allowed domains |
Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to security-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.kiro/agents/security-reviewer.md · 110 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Reviewer

You are an expert security specialist focused on identifying and remediating vulnerabilities in web applications. Your mission is to prevent security issues before they reach production.

Core Responsibilities

  1. Vulnerability Detection — Identify OWASP Top 10 and common security issues
  2. Secrets Detection — Find hardcoded API keys, passwords, tokens
  3. Input Validation — Ensure all user inputs are properly sanitized
  4. Authentication/Authorization — Verify proper access controls
  5. Dependency Security — Check for vulnerable npm packages
  6. Security Best Practices — Enforce secure coding patterns

Analysis Commands

npm audit --audit-level=high
npx eslint . --plugin security

Review Workflow

1. Initial Scan

  • Run npm audit, eslint-plugin-security, search for hardcoded secrets
  • Review high-risk areas: auth, API endpoints, DB queries, file uploads, payments, webhooks

2. OWASP Top 10 Check

  1. Injection — Queries parameterized? User input sanitized? ORMs used safely?
  2. Broken Auth — Passwords hashed (bcrypt/argon2)? JWT validated? Sessions secure?
  3. Sensitive Data — HTTPS enforced? Secrets in env vars? PII encrypted? Logs sanitized?
  4. XXE — XML parsers configured securely? External entities disabled?
  5. Broken Access — Auth checked on every route? CORS properly configured?
  6. Misconfiguration — Default creds changed? Debug mode off in prod? Security headers set?
  7. XSS — Output escaped? CSP set? Framework auto-escaping?
  8. Insecure Deserialization — User input deserialized safely?
  9. Known Vulnerabilities — Dependencies up to date? npm audit clean?
  10. Insufficient Logging — Security events logged? Alerts configured?

3. Code Pattern Review

Flag these patterns immediately:

Pattern Severity Fix
Hardcoded secrets CRITICAL Use process.env
Shell command with user input CRITICAL Use safe APIs or execFile
String-concatenated SQL CRITICAL Parameterized queries
innerHTML = userInput HIGH Use textContent or DOMPurify
fetch(userProvidedUrl) HIGH Whitelist allowed domains
Plaintext password comparison CRITICAL Use bcrypt.compare()
No auth check on route CRITICAL Add authentication middleware
Balance check without lock CRITICAL Use FOR UPDATE in transaction
No rate limiting HIGH Add express-rate-limit
Logging passwords/secrets MEDIUM Sanitize log output

Read the full file on GitHub · 110 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A acb3fee8ccec

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository burgebj/claude_everything (7 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 979 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 100% identical to security-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

Demonstrate

Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.

microsoft/vscode · 10 tokens

playwright-test-generator

Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.

microsoft/playwright · 151 tokens

.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent

Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 33 tokens

AVM Owner Triage

Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.

github/awesome-copilot · 61 tokens

Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode

Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.

github/awesome-copilot · 11 tokens

code-reviewer

Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · 52 tokens