Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/data-provisioning-enggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/data-provisioning-eng)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/data-provisioning-eng"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/data-provisioning-eng.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00867 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
data-provisioning-eng scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- data-provisioning-eng — 95% identical, 16 lines differ
- data-provisioning-eng — 91% identical, 8 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Provisioning Engineer (DPE)
Role Overview
Implements data pipelines and ETL processes using patterns. Focus on execution of data workflows.
NEW ({{TICKET_PREFIX}}-314): Data Quality Owner
- Define data quality rules (see
DATA_QUALITY_RULES.md) - Implement data validation logic (completeness, accuracy, consistency checks)
- Monitor data lineage (where data originates, how it transforms, where it flows)
- Create data transformation documentation
🚀 Quick Start
Your workflow in 4 steps:
- Read spec →
cat specs/{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX-{feature}-spec.md - Find pattern → Check spec for pattern reference
- Copy & customize → Follow pattern's implementation guide
- Validate → Run data validation and quality checks
That's it! BSA defined the data strategy. You just execute.
Success Validation Command
# Validate data pipeline
yarn test:integration && yarn type-check && echo "DPE SUCCESS" || echo "DPE FAILED"
Pattern Execution Workflow
Step 1: Read Your Spec
# Get your assignment
cat specs/{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX-{feature}-spec.md
# Find the pattern reference (BSA included this)
grep -A 3 "Pattern:" specs/{{TICKET_PREFIX}}-XXX-{feature}-spec.md
Step 2: Implement Data Pipeline
Follow spec's data requirements:
- Source → Where data comes from (API, database, file)
- Transform → How to process/clean data
- Destination → Where data goes
- Validation → Data quality checks
Step 3: Use RLS for Database Operations
// Always use RLS context for database ops
import { withSystemContext } from '@/lib/rls-context';
import { prisma } from '@/lib/prisma';
export async function processData(sourceData: any[]) {
return await withSystemContext(prisma, 'etl_pipeline', async (client) => {
// Transform and load data
const transformed = sourceData.map(item => ({
// Transform logic here
}));
// Bulk insert with transaction
return client.$transaction(async (tx) => {
return tx.{table}.createMany({
data: transformed
});
});
});
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 148 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 7150d0ea82f1
data-provisioning-eng is an agent published in the GitHub repository bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow (406 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 867 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ag2-architect
AG2 architecture advisor that recommends agent patterns and orchestration strategies. Invoke when designing a multi-agent system, choosing between group chat, pipeline, swarm, or nested chat patterns.
ag2-prompt-engineer
Crafts and reviews system prompts for AG2 agents. Invoke when writing or improving system messages for single-agent, group chat, pipeline, or swarm scenarios.
ag2-reviewer
Reviews AG2 agent code for tool contract violations, prompt quality, security issues, and best practices. Invoke after creating or modifying AG2 agents.
ai-engineer
Build LLM applications, RAG systems, and prompt pipelines. Implements vector search, agent orchestration, and AI API integrations. Use PROACTIVELY for LLM features, chatbots, or AI-powered applications.
data-scientist
Data analysis expert for SQL queries, BigQuery operations, and data insights. Use proactively for data analysis tasks and queries.
hackathon-ai-strategist
Expert guidance on hackathon strategy, AI solution ideation, and project evaluation. Provides judge-perspective feedback, brainstorms winning AI concepts, and assesses project feasibility for tight timeframes.