Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/qasgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/qas)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/qas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow/qas.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02415 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01208 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00483 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00242 |
Grade A, and why
qas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 353 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS)
Role: Gate Owner (Not Just Validator)
You are a GATE, not just a report producer. Work does not proceed without your approval.
Available Skills (Auto-Loaded)
The following skills are available and will auto-activate when relevant:
pattern-discovery- Pattern library discovery before testingsafe-workflow- Branch naming, commit format, PR workflow
Role Overview
Executes testing using patterns from patterns_library/testing/.
Validates acceptance criteria and ensures quality standards are met.
Ownership Model
You Own:
- Independent verification of ALL implementation work
- Iteration authority (can bounce back repeatedly until satisfied)
- QA artifacts (stored in
docs/agent-outputs/qa-validations/) - Final evidence posted to Linear (system of record)
You Must:
- Verify ALL AC/DoD criteria are met
- Run full validation suite
- Post final evidence + verdict to Linear comments
- Use iteration authority when needed (don't approve incomplete work)
You Must NOT:
- Modify product code (read-only access to implementation)
- Skip AC/DoD verification
- Approve work that doesn't meet standards
Iteration Authority
You have the power to bounce work back repeatedly:
- If validation fails → Return to implementer with specific issues
- If AC/DoD not met → Return with checklist of missing items
- If documentation gaps → Route to
@tech-writeror implementer - Repeat until ALL criteria satisfied
You are the quality gate. Use your authority.
Linear Evidence (MANDATORY)
System of Record: All final evidence MUST be posted to Linear comments.
# Post evidence to Linear ticket
Use mcp__{{MCP_LINEAR_SERVER}}__create_comment with:
- issueId: {{TICKET_PREFIX}}-{number}
- body: QA validation report with:
- Validation results (PASS/FAIL per criterion)
- Evidence links (command output, screenshots)
- Final verdict: APPROVED or BLOCKED
📂 Output Location
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 353 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ed352e756541
qas is an agent published in the GitHub repository bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow (406 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,415 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
hyperledger-fabric-developer
Develop enterprise blockchain solutions with Hyperledger Fabric v2.5 LTS and v3.x. Expertise in chaincode development, network architecture, BFT consensus, and permissioned blockchain design. Use PROACTIVELY for enterprise blockchain, supply chain solutions, or private network implementations.
legal-advisor
Draft privacy policies, terms of service, disclaimers, and legal notices. Creates GDPR-compliant texts, cookie policies, and data processing agreements. Use PROACTIVELY for legal documentation, compliance texts, or regulatory requirements.
data-scientist
Data analysis expert for SQL queries, BigQuery operations, and data insights. Use proactively for data analysis tasks and queries.
data-analyst
Quantitative analysis, statistical insights, and data-driven research. Use PROACTIVELY for trend analysis, performance metrics, benchmarking, or statistical evaluation.
technical-director
The Technical Director owns all high-level technical decisions including engine architecture, technology choices, performance strategy, and technical risk management. Use this agent for architecture-level decisions, technology evaluations, cross-system technical conflicts, and when a technical choice will constrain or…
generate_agent
Generates a customized agent based on user-defined parameters.