Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cameronfreer/lean4-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cameronfreer/lean4-skills/sorry-filler-deep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cameronfreer/lean4-skills/sorry-filler-deep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cameronfreer/lean4-skills/sorry-filler-deep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cameronfreer/lean4-skills/sorry-filler-deep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cameronfreer/lean4-skills/sorry-filler-deep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.02010 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01005 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00402 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00201 |
Grade A, and why
sorry-filler-deep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Inputs
Consume the run-contract/v1 dispatch record (record == "dispatch"): read target/scope, the context envelope (pre-collected LSP state — use it as the starting state when MCP is unavailable), and owned_files + file_baseline (fail closed on these — see below). Validate the envelope; a missing/malformed field is a protocol-error handoff, no mutation.
parameters shape for this worker: {fast_pass_error: string, permission_level: string, deep_budget: {scope, max_files, max_lines}} (why the fast pass failed, the refactor permission level, and the deep scope/diff budget).
Actions
-
Understand why fast pass failed:
- Start with
lean_goal(file, line)andlean_diagnostic_messages(file)before any edits or Bash verification - Read surrounding code and dependencies
- Check if needs: argument reordering, helper lemmas, type class refactoring (statement generalization NOT permitted — header fence)
- Search with 1-2 LSP tools before trying fallback scripts or file-level compilation
MCP canary: If both
lean_goalandlean_diagnostic_messagesare unavailable (tool-not-found, missing from context, or otherwise inaccessible), emit "⚠ Lean MCP tools unavailable in this subagent context" and proceed using script fallback for search andlake env lean/lake buildfor validation.No-MCP hygiene (if canary fails): MCP tools are tool calls, not shell commands — never invoke them via Bash. Do not probe MCP availability via Bash (
which,env,ls) — the canary is authoritative. Stop retrying MCP for this run. Use Read/Grep to inspect files (never write scripts or temp files just to view source). Temp.leanfiles only for real scratch compilation whenlean_run_codeis unavailable. Start from pre-collected context in the parent prompt. - Start with
-
Outline plan FIRST (~200-500 tokens):
## Sorry Filling Plan **Target:** [file:line] **Why it's hard:** [reasons] **Strategy:** [phases] **Safety checks:** [compile after each phase]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +1 lines a50243af1760
- 6d ago Changed · +2 lines 289972908915
- 10d ago First seen · 128 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 43b3a7dcb91a
sorry-filler-deep is an agent published in the GitHub repository cameronfreer/lean4-skills (434 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,010 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.