Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to carmentacollective/carmenta. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/carmentacollective/carmenta/main/.claude/agents/empathy-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carmentacollective/carmentaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02246 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00898 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00449 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
empathy-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 275 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 1d10ea7a08cc
empathy-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository carmentacollective/carmenta (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,246 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
product-dx-specialist
Use this agent when analyzing features from a developer experience and product perspective. Specializes in API design, developer workflows, syntax clarity, and ease of use.
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
experience-reviewer
Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…
frontend-visual
Visual QA specialist using Playwright MCP and Figma MCP for pixel-perfect frontend implementation and debugging.
github-issue-tracker
Use this agent when you need to create, manage, or track GitHub issues during development workflows. Creates properly formatted issues with context, labels, and assignees. Read-only agent for production safety.
code-reviewer
Use this agent for code review before commits or PRs. Checks for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and code quality. Provides actionable feedback with specific line references.