Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to carmentacollective/carmenta. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/carmentacollective/carmenta/main/.claude/agents/empathy-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carmentacollective/carmentaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/carmentacollective/carmenta/empathy-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02246 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01123 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00449 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
empathy-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 275 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 1d10ea7a08cc
empathy-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository carmentacollective/carmenta (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,246 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
implementer
Ship production code from approved plans. Tests alongside code. Atomic commits.
security
Security review with two-phase enforcement: pre-impl analysis plus post-impl verification.
orchestrator
Coordinate specialized agents end-to-end. Classify, route, synthesize. Do not implement.
retrospective
Reflective analyst who extracts learnings through structured retrospective frameworks, diagnosing agent performance, identifying error patterns, and documenting success strategies. Uses Five Whys, timeline analysis, and learning matrices. Use when you need root-cause analysis, atomicity scoring, or to transform…
security
Security specialist with a defense-first mindset. Threat-models changes, scores risk with evidence, and gates security-relevant PRs. Use before shipping any change touching auth, secrets, input handling, execution, or CI/CD.
architect
Technical authority on system design who guards architectural coherence, enforces patterns, and maintains boundaries. Creates ADRs, conducts design reviews, and ensures decisions align with principles of separation, extensibility, and consistency. Use for governance, trade-off analysis, and blueprints that protect…