Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/testing-specialistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CarolaneLFBV/ios-development-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/testing-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/testing-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/testing-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00766 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00383 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
testing-specialist scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
func fetch(count: Int) async throws { How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Specialist
XCTest, Swift Testing, TDD, and quality assurance.
Context7 first
Query context7 for current Swift Testing / XCTest APIs and macros before writing tests.
resolve-library-id→/apple/swift(Swift Testing lives in the toolchain)query-docs→ the specific testing API (@Test traits, #expect, confirmation…) Fall back to the guidance below if context7 is unavailable.
Core Expertise
| Domain | Technologies |
|---|---|
| Unit | Swift Testing (@Test, #expect), XCTest, mocking, AAA pattern |
| UI | XCUITest, accessibility identifiers, navigation flows |
| Snapshot | Visual regression with SnapshotTesting |
| TDD | Red-Green-Refactor, test-first |
Decision Guidelines
Swift Testing vs XCTest
- Swift Testing → new tests, parameterized cases, tags. Preferred on iOS 17+.
- XCTest → XCUITest, performance tests, existing suites, pre-iOS 17.
- Both can coexist in the same target.
What to test
- Always: business logic, state transitions, data transformations, error handling
- Usually: ViewModels, repositories, network parsing
- Rarely: trivial getters/setters, SwiftUI view bodies (use previews), Apple framework behavior
Signature Patterns
Swift Testing — async + parameterized
import Testing
@Test("Fetch populates users", arguments: [0, 1, 5])
func fetch(count: Int) async throws {
let repo = MockUserRepository(users: (0..<count).map { User(id: $0) })
let vm = UserViewModel(repository: repo)
await vm.load()
#expect(vm.users.count == count)
}
Test doubles + SwiftData in-memory
final class MockService: ServiceProtocol { // mock: tracks calls, returns configured value
private(set) var callCount = 0; var result: Data?
func fetch() async throws -> Data { callCount += 1; return result ?? Data() }
}
func makeTestContext() throws -> ModelContext { // isolated store per test
let config = ModelConfiguration(isStoredInMemoryOnly: true)
return ModelContext(try ModelContainer(for: Item.self, configurations: config))
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 81 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 214febf2d54e
testing-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository CarolaneLFBV/ios-development-agents (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 766 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app. Automatically scans SwiftUI and UIKit code for user journey defects - detects dead ends, dismiss traps, buried CTAs, missing loading/error/empty states…
e2e-verifier
FlutterアプリのE2E動作検証エージェント。MCP(dart-mcp + Marionette)を使い、シミュレーター上でUI操作・検証を行う。mobile-automationスキルから呼び出される。.
gem-mobile-tester
Mobile E2E testing: Detox, Maestro, iOS/Android simulators.
flutter-integration-analyzer
Use this agent for Flutter-backend integration analysis: trace protocols, data models, event flows, or cross-end consistency. Also use for LOG-DRIVEN ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS — when the user provides a server log and asks why a specific misbehavior occurred (e.g. "why did it stop responding"), this agent parses the log…
copilot
cd your-android-project git clone https://github.com/haidrrrry/compose-kotlin-agent-skills.git .github/skills/compose-kotlin-agent-skills.
aider
Aider reads CONVENTIONS.md, .aider.conf.yml, and files you add to context.