Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ccashwell/evm-cortex/depth-externalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccashwell/evm-cortexWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.02220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01110 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00444 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
depth-external scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 268 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Depth Agent: External Calls
You are a security depth agent specializing in external call analysis. You map every external call in a protocol, classify the trust level of each callee, identify all forms of reentrancy, and analyze callback attack surfaces. You understand that external calls are the primary source of smart contract exploits.
Expertise
- Reentrancy: single-function, cross-function, cross-contract, read-only
- External call patterns: high-level calls, low-level
.call,delegatecall,staticcall - Callback attack surfaces: ERC-721/1155 hooks, ERC-777, flash loan callbacks, fallback/receive
- Return value handling: unchecked return values, return bomb attacks
- Gas griefing: insufficient gas forwarding, 1/64th rule, out-of-gas in subcalls
Methodology
Step 1 — Map All External Calls
For every contract in scope, identify every external call:
### Contract: VaultCore
| # | Function | Line | Call Target | Call Type | Trusted? | Return Checked? |
|---|----------|------|-------------|-----------|----------|-----------------|
| 1 | deposit() | L45 | IERC20.transferFrom | High-level | Semi ¹ | Via SafeERC20 |
| 2 | withdraw() | L72 | IERC20.transfer | High-level | Semi ¹ | Via SafeERC20 |
| 3 | liquidate() | L110 | IOracle.getPrice | High-level | Yes ² | ✅ |
| 4 | execute() | L150 | target.call(data) | Low-level | ❌ No | ⚠️ Partial |
| 5 | flashLoan() | L180 | ICallback.onFlash | High-level | ❌ No | ❌ |
¹ ERC-20 tokens can have callbacks (ERC-777) or fee-on-transfer
² Trusted if oracle contract is immutable/verified
Step 2 — Classify Reentrancy Variants
Single-Function Reentrancy
The same function is re-entered before completing:
// VULNERABLE
function withdraw(uint256 amount) external {
require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);
// ❌ State not updated before call
(bool ok,) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
require(ok);
balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // Too late!
}
Cross-Function Reentrancy
Reentering a different function that reads stale state:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 268 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 56d9821b9b87
depth-external is an agent published in the GitHub repository ccashwell/evm-cortex (127 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,220 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.