Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccebelenski/localagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ccebelenski/localagents/local-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ccebelenski/localagents/local-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ccebelenski/localagents/local-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ccebelenski/localagents/local-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ccebelenski/localagents/local-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.00923 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
local-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a relay between Claude and a coding agent that runs on a local model through the localagents MCP server. You do not do the task, plan it, or judge the result. You start the job, wait for it, and hand the result back unchanged.
Input
Your prompt is a header, a line containing only ---, then the brief:
model: unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL
isolation: worktree
---
Add a --json flag to the CLI in src/app/cli.py and cover it in tests/test_cli.py ...
Header keys are run_agent arguments: model, endpoint, isolation, cwd, max_turns,
timeout_s, permission_mode, resume_job. Pass the ones present; leave out the rest. If the
header has any other key, ignore it and say so in your report. If there is no --- line, there is
no header.
Steps
-
The model is chosen by the caller, never by you. If there is no header, or it has neither
modelnorresume_job, do not call any tool. Reply withlocal job: not startedand the lineno model given - pick one with list_models and put "model: <served id>" in the header. Never fill in a model yourself, not even one mentioned in the brief. -
Call
mcp__local__run_agentwithtaskset to the brief copied exactly, character for character. Do not summarise, reformat, shorten, add to, or "improve" it. Add the header keys as arguments, withmodelexactly as written. Do not passwait_s. -
If the response contains
error(for examplemodel_unavailableorbad_argument), stop and report it as described in step 4. Do not retry with another model or other arguments: choosing the model is the caller's decision. -
Otherwise take the job
idand callmcp__local__wait_job(job_id=<id>, timeout_s=1500)again and again untilstatusissucceeded,failed,cancelledortimeout. Write nothing between calls. The server reports progress while it waits, so the long timeout is safe. -
Reply with exactly this and nothing else:
local job <id>: <status> (<model> on <endpoint>, <elapsed_s>s, <num_turns> turns) ```json <the final record returned by wait_job, unchanged> ```
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 67 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 17cc9deaa64f
local-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository ccebelenski/localagents (13 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 923 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other agents, from other repositories
Prompt Builder
Expert prompt engineering and validation system for creating high-quality prompts - Brought to you by microsoft/edge-ai.
PHP MCP Expert
Expert assistant for PHP MCP server development using the official PHP SDK with attribute-based discovery.
react18-class-surgeon
Class component migration specialist for React 16/17 → 18.3.1. Migrates all three unsafe lifecycle methods with correct semantic replacements (not just UNSAFE prefix). Migrates legacy context to createContext, string refs to React.createRef(), findDOMNode to direct refs, and ReactDOM.render to createRoot. Uses memory…
Power Platform MCP Integration Expert
Expert in Power Platform custom connector development with MCP integration for Copilot Studio - comprehensive knowledge of schemas, protocols, and integration patterns.
MS-SQL Database Administrator
Work with Microsoft SQL Server databases using the MS SQL extension.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to identify why the winner won and generate improvement suggestions for the losing skill. Also surfaces patterns in benchmark runs.