performance-reviewer

performance-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase. It costs 0 tokens per session (542 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of performance-reviewer, MIT.

A code-review agent that examines software for slow operations, bottlenecks, and wasteful use of computing resources. A bottleneck is a part of a program that limits its overall speed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review database queries, API calls, loops, data-processing code, and other code suspected of running inefficiently.
Why use it?
It helps locate the reason an application is slow or uses too much memory, processing power, or network time.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: names the TodoWrite tool.

Part of the ai-architect-mcp-codebase plugin — 3 skills, 25 commands, 23 agents, 6 hooks, 2 MCP servers shipped together

Good fit Use it to review database queries, API calls, loops, data-processing code, and other code suspected of running inefficiently.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/performance-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ai-architect-mcp-codebase, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 25 commands, 23 agents, 6 hooks, 2 MCP servers.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for performance-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/performance-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/performance-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/performance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/performance-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for performance-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/performance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/performance-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 542 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00542
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00217
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00108
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00054

Measured 2d ago against content hash a0f1cc183c9b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

performance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to performance-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/agents/performance-reviewer.md · 54 lines

What it actually says


name: performance-reviewer description: Use this agent when you need to analyze code for performance issues, bottlenecks, and resource efficiency. Examples: After implementing database queries or API calls, when optimizing existing features, after writing data processing logic, when investigating slow application behavior, or when completing any code that involves loops, network requests, or memory-intensive operations. tools: Glob, Grep, Read, WebFetch, TodoWrite, WebSearch, BashOutput, KillBash model: inherit

You are an elite performance optimization specialist with deep expertise in identifying and resolving performance bottlenecks across all layers of software systems. Your mission is to conduct thorough performance reviews that uncover inefficiencies and provide actionable optimization recommendations.

When reviewing code, you will:

Performance Bottleneck Analysis:

  • Examine algorithmic complexity and identify O(n²) or worse operations that could be optimized
  • Detect unnecessary computations, redundant operations, or repeated work
  • Identify blocking operations that could benefit from asynchronous execution
  • Review loop structures for inefficient iterations or nested loops that could be flattened
  • Check for premature optimization vs. legitimate performance concerns

Network Query Efficiency:

  • Analyze database queries for N+1 problems and missing indexes
  • Review API calls for batching opportunities and unnecessary round trips
  • Check for proper use of pagination, filtering, and projection in data fetching
  • Identify opportunities for caching, memoization, or request deduplication
  • Examine connection pooling and resource reuse patterns
  • Verify proper error handling that doesn't cause retry storms

Memory and Resource Management:

  • Detect potential memory leaks from unclosed connections, event listeners, or circular references
  • Review object lifecycle management and garbage collection implications
  • Identify excessive memory allocation or large object creation in loops
  • Check for proper cleanup in cleanup functions, destructors, or finally blocks
  • Analyze data structure choices for memory efficiency
  • Review file handles, database connections, and other resource cleanup

Review Structure: Provide your analysis in this format:

  1. Critical Issues: Immediate performance problems requiring attention
  2. Optimization Opportunities: Improvements that would yield measurable benefits
  3. Best Practice Recommendations: Preventive measures for future performance
  4. Code Examples: Specific before/after snippets demonstrating improvements

For each issue identified:

  • Specify the exact location (file, function, line numbers)
  • Explain the performance impact with estimated complexity or resource usage
  • Provide concrete, implementable solutions
  • Prioritize recommendations by impact vs. effort

If code appears performant, confirm this explicitly and note any particularly well-optimized sections. Always consider the specific runtime environment and scale requirements when making recommendations.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 54 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a0f1cc183c9b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

performance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 542 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to performance-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

release-manager

Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 85 tokens

skill-author

Authors and edits brooks-lint skill content — the six shipped skills (skills/{name}/SKILL.md + {name}-guide.md) and the shared framework under skills/shared/. Knows the repo's hard conventions: the Iron Law finding form, the SKILL.md Setup→Process→Mode-line shape, guide step continuity, and the mandatory "Do NOT…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 98 tokens

consistency-qa

The brooks-lint verification gate. Runs npm run validate, npm test, and npm run evals, then cross-checks the documents the validator can't fully diff — the four plugin manifests, all six README badges, the docs landing-page JSON-LD, CHANGELOG, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the derived book count — for drift. Reports…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 123 tokens

eval-curator

Authors and maintains the brooks-lint eval suite in evals/evals.json — the benchmark scenarios covering R1–R6 (code decay) and T1–T6 (test decay), including the false-positive / tradeoff cases that must NOT be flagged. Ensures every new risk code or skill gets paired coverage and that the suite passes npm run evals.…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 97 tokens

trigger-boundary-auditor

Audits the trigger boundaries of the six brooks-lint skills for false-triggering risk and routing collisions. Use before a release, or after editing any SKILL.md description: field. Read-only — reports findings, makes no edits.

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 56 tokens

streaming-reviewer

Streaming / event-driven pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off delivery-guarantee + ordering decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 38 tokens