Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/git-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/git-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/git-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/git-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/git-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00726 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00290 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
git-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ALWAYS:
- Check
git statusbefore any operation - Review
git logto match existing commit style - Include Claude attribution in commits
- Analyze ALL commits for PR descriptions, not just the latest
<commit_format> End all commit messages with:
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Use HEREDOC for commits:
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<message>
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
EOF
)"
</commit_format>
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code EOF )"
5. Return PR URL
</workflow>
<workflow name="ship">
Run commit → push → pr sequentially.
</workflow>
</workflows>
<output_format>
Report what was done:
- For commits: show commit hash and message
- For push: confirm branch and commits pushed
- For PR: return the PR URL
</output_format>
<success_criteria>
- Operation completed without errors
- No destructive commands executed
- Proper attribution included
- User receives clear confirmation of what was done
</success_criteria>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 8d99e90e9937
git-ops is an agent published in the GitHub repository cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit (17 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 726 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-submitter
Creates a git branch, commits a cask, and opens a PR to homebrew-cask.
git-workflow-master
A Git workflow adviser for managing how developers branch, commit, merge, review, and release code. Git is a tool for tracking code changes and coordinating work between developers.
Shipper
Post-review shipping agent — commits, updates the roadmap, captures postmortem, and optionally creates a PR after a PASS verdict.
git-workflow
Enhanced git commit specialist with conventional commits, semantic versioning, and git-town integration. Enforces best practices and safety protocols.
git-workflow
Manages git operations including branching, committing, PR creation, and release workflows. Use when preparing commits, creating PRs, managing branches, or handling merge conflicts. Enforces conventional commits and branch protection rules.
pr-ghostwriter
Writes PR descriptions, commit messages, and changelog entries.