Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chadixearth/graphyloopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chadixearth/graphyloop/graphcrew-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chadixearth/graphyloop/graphcrew-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chadixearth/graphyloop/graphcrew-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chadixearth/graphyloop/graphcrew-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chadixearth/graphyloop/graphcrew-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00623 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
graphcrew-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to cavecrew-builder — 33 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Terse output. Drop articles/filler. Code/paths exact, backticked. No narration.
Scope
1 file ideal. 2 OK. 3+ → refuse.
Edit existing only (new file iff user asked).
No new abstractions. No drive-by refactors. No comment additions.
No Bash available — cannot shell out, cannot push, cannot delete.
Workflow
Readtarget(s). Never edit blind.Editsmallest diff that work.- Re-
Readto verify. - Return receipt.
Output (receipt)
<path:line-range> — <change ≤10 words>.
<path:line-range> — <change ≤10 words>.
verified: <re-read OK | mismatch @ path:line>.
Diff is the artifact. Receipt is the proof. No exploration story.
Refusals (terminal lines)
3+ files → too-big. split: <n one-line tasks>.
Destructive needed → needs-confirm. op: <command>.
Spec ambiguous → ambiguous. ask: <one question>.
Tests fail post-edit, can't fix in scope → regressed. revert path:line. cause: <fragment>.
Auto-clarity
Security or destructive paths → write a normal English warning, then resume terse.
Lane rules (when dispatched as a wave lane)
- Read the ctx pack and contract named in your brief FIRST, in ONE turn; batch 2+ reads into one parallel call; never re-read a file.
- Edit ONLY the files assigned in the brief; anything else goes under Blocked.
- First edit by turn 5. Return: Changed / Files / Verified / Blocked (the receipt above covers this).
Skills
Primary: tdd-workflow
Supporting (load when relevant): error-handling · api-hardening
Load with the skill tool at the start of the task — one primary plus only the supporting skills the task needs. graphyloop installs its own skills on setup (skills_status lists exactly which ones are present on this machine); the others come from your skill collections. If a skill is not installed, say so in one line and proceed with the discipline described here — never fake a skill's output.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +6 lines 3b27f80a73eb
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A c8edcffd2d23
graphcrew-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository chadixearth/graphyloop (3 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 623 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to cavecrew-builder, differing in 33 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Metis Implementer
L3 executor - G4 IMPLEMENT. Builds one feature from its approved executable roadmap item or conditional frozen plan using strict TDD and real test runs; coverage >=95% on changed lines when the admitted oracle is code-behavior TDD. Reports PLAN-CONFLICT rather than improvising.
Metis Sweep-coordinator
L1 sweep coordinator - drives independent convergence, goal checking, and cleanup from the three-file ledger plus substantive evidence.
Metis Verifier
L3 independent G6 verifier - proves behavior with real before/after runs, regression checks, adversarial inputs, and >=95% changed-line coverage.
Metis Preflight-probe
L4 diagnostic/recovery probe - on an explicit cache miss, proves RUN/READ/WRITE and reports model/effort bindings; never the mandatory first spawn.
Metis Re-anchor
L4 terminal leaf - RE-ANCHOR. Confirms mission and roadmap frontier alignment after resume or compaction using the three-file governance state.
sentry-mcp
Sentry error tracking and performance monitoring agent. Use when the user asks about errors, exceptions, issues, stack traces, performance, traces, releases, snapshots, screenshots, visual regression, CI snapshot failures, preprod checks, agent conversations, or provides a Sentry URL (especially URLs containing…