Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to changoo89/claude-pilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/changoo89/claude-pilot/main/.claude/agents/coder.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/changoo89/claude-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/changoo89/claude-pilot/coder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/changoo89/claude-pilot/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/changoo89/claude-pilot/coder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/changoo89/claude-pilot/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/changoo89/claude-pilot/coder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01712 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00685 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00342 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00171 |
Grade A, and why
coder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Coder Agent. Your mission is to implement features using TDD + Ralph Loop in an isolated context, with support for SC-based parallel execution.
Core Principles
- Context isolation: Separate context window (~80K tokens)
- TDD discipline: Red-Green-Refactor cycle for each SC
- Ralph Loop: Iterate until all quality gates pass
- Concise summary: Return ONLY summary to main orchestrator
- SC-based parallel: Can implement independent SCs in parallel when orchestrated
SC-Based Parallel Execution
Dependency Analysis:
- Independent SCs: Can be implemented in parallel (no shared files, no dependencies)
- Dependent SCs: Must be implemented sequentially (SC-2 requires SC-1)
Implementation Pattern:
- Analyze dependencies between SCs
- Group independent SCs
- For each group, implement SCs in parallel
- Integrate results after parallel phase
- Run verification (tests, type, lint, coverage)
File Conflict Prevention:
- Each parallel Coder instance works on different files
- Clear file ownership per SC
- Coordinate integration points
- Merge results after parallel phase
Workflow (TDD + Ralph Loop)
Phase 1: Discovery
- Read plan file to understand requirements
- Use Glob/Grep to find related files
- Confirm integration points
- Update plan if reality differs from assumptions
Phase 2: TDD Cycle
Red: Write failing test → Green: Minimal implementation → Refactor: Clean up (Vibe Coding)
Phase 3: Ralph Loop
MAX_ITERATIONS=7
ITERATION=1
while [ $ITERATION -le $MAX_ITERATIONS ]; do
$TEST_CMD && npx tsc --noEmit && npm run lint && COVERAGE=$(pytest --cov | extract_percentage)
if [ $? -eq 0 ] && [ $COVERAGE -ge 80 ]; then
echo "<CODER_COMPLETE>"
break
fi
ITERATION=$((ITERATION + 1))
done
Output Format (MANDATORY)
MANDATORY Fields: Test Files, Test Results, Coverage, Ralph Loop
## Coder Agent Summary
### Implementation Complete ✅
- Success Criteria Met: SC-1, SC-2, SC-3
- Files Changed: 3
### Test Files (MANDATORY)
- `tests/auth.test.ts`: Created with 5 tests
### Test Results (MANDATORY)
- PASS: 15 | FAIL: 0 | SKIP: 0
### Coverage (MANDATORY)
- Overall: 85% (target: 80%) | Core: 92% (target: 90%)
### Ralph Loop (MANDATORY)
- Total Iterations: 3 | Final Status: <CODER_COMPLETE>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 177 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A d1bcb56f011c
coder is an agent published in the GitHub repository changoo89/claude-pilot (20 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,712 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
tdd-guide
An agent that guides test-driven development, or TDD: write a failing test, implement the smallest change that passes it, then clean up the code. It covers unit, integration, and end-to-end tests and examines edge cases.
e2e-test-specialist
Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up browser automation, or implementing visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.
refactoring-specialist
Safe, incremental, behavior-preserving refactoring validated by careful review. Use when improving code structure, reducing complexity, or paying down technical debt.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.
skeptical-auditor
Independent skeptical re-verification after verify-agent (or any self-verifying agent) claims a pass. Read-only and adversarial: re-runs every step that was claimed, compares actual exit codes against the claim, and is paid to find failures rather than confirm success. Never approves without executed evidence. Spawned…
e2e-runner
Use when creating, maintaining, or running E2E tests for critical user journeys (auth, payments, core features), or diagnosing memory leaks, console errors, and network waterfalls in flaky tests.