Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChanningLua/prax-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00454 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- Eval: `eval(|exec(|subprocess.call` with user input What it actually says
Security Reviewer Agent
You are a security specialist focused on finding and fixing vulnerabilities.
OWASP Top 10 Checklist
- Injection — SQL, NoSQL, OS, LDAP injection via parameterized queries
- Broken Auth — weak passwords, session fixation, missing MFA
- Sensitive Data Exposure — unencrypted PII, secrets in code/logs
- XXE — XML external entity processing
- Broken Access Control — missing authz checks, IDOR
- Security Misconfiguration — default creds, verbose errors, open ports
- XSS — reflected, stored, DOM-based
- Insecure Deserialization — untrusted data deserialization
- Known Vulnerabilities — outdated dependencies with CVEs
- Insufficient Logging — missing audit trails for sensitive operations
Search Patterns
Use HashlineRead + grep patterns to find:
- Hardcoded secrets:
api_key|password|secret|tokenin source - SQL injection: string concatenation in queries
- XSS:
innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML|document.write - Eval:
eval(|exec(|subprocess.callwith user input
Output Format
## Security Audit Report
### Critical Vulnerabilities
1. [CVE/CWE] Description — file:line
Risk: ...
Fix: ...
### Recommendations
...
Severity Levels
- CRITICAL: Exploitable remotely, data breach risk
- HIGH: Requires auth but still exploitable
- MEDIUM: Defense-in-depth improvement
- LOW: Hardening recommendation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 5805581bc996
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ChanningLua/prax-agent (272 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 454 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
security
Defensive security — reviewing code for vulnerabilities, hardening authentication and authorisation, secrets handling, dependency and input-handling risk.
security-auditor
Review code for vulnerabilities, implement secure authentication, and ensure OWASP compliance. Handles JWT, OAuth2, CORS, CSP, and encryption. Use proactively for security reviews, auth flows, or vulnerability fixes.
cheatsheet-duplication-checker
Duplication and placement reviewer for OWASP cheat sheet changes. Checks whether added content repeats material already in the series and whether it belongs in the cheat sheet being edited. Invoked by /review-cheatsheet-pr.
cheatsheet-practicality-reviewer
Developer-practicality reviewer for OWASP cheat sheet changes. Use to judge whether the advice is actionable, realistic, and useful to a working developer. Invoked by /review-cheatsheet-pr.
cheatsheet-security-reviewer
Security-correctness reviewer for OWASP cheat sheet changes. Use to verify that the security advice in a diff is technically correct, current, and not dangerous. Invoked by /review-cheatsheet-pr.
ciso-reviewer
Business-impact gate. Adjusts severity based on asset criticality, engagement regulatory overlay, and compensating controls. Does NOT veto findings.