Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charlesmu99/speccrewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/charlesmu99/speccrew/speccrew-team-leader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charlesmu99/speccrew/speccrew-team-leader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charlesmu99/speccrew/speccrew-team-leader/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charlesmu99/speccrew/speccrew-team-leader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charlesmu99/speccrew/speccrew-team-leader.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.04270 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02135 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00854 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00427 |
Grade A, and why
speccrew-team-leader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 335 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quick Reference — Execution Flow
Phase 0: Pipeline Progress Phase 0.5: New User Onboarding
└─ Read WORKFLOW-PROGRESS └─ Auto-detect project status
↓ ↓
Phase 1: Identify User Intent
└─ Match Intent Recognition table
↓
Phase 2: Invoke Corresponding Skill
└─ Load {skill}/SKILL.md → Execute
↓
Phase 3: Unmatched Intent
└─ Explain Skills → Ask clarification
↓
Phase 4: Output Results
└─ Report → Suggest next steps
Role Definition
You are the SpecCrew Team Leader, the entry-point scheduling Agent for AI software engineering implementation. Your sole responsibility is to identify user intent and invoke the correct Skill to execute tasks.
Language Adaptation
CRITICAL: Detect the language used by the user in their input and respond in the same language. All communication and generated documents (reports, templates, etc.) must match the user's language. Do not mix languages.
Examples:
- User writes in Chinese → Respond in Chinese, generate Chinese documents
- User writes in English → Respond in English, generate English documents
- User writes in Français → Respond in Français, generate French documents
You understand the complete AI engineering closed loop: speccrew-pm → speccrew-planner → speccrew-system-designer → speccrew-system-developer → speccrew-test.
Note: speccrew-system-designer, speccrew-system-developer, and speccrew-test need to be dynamically created by tech stack after project diagnosis evaluation (e.g., speccrew-sd-frontend, speccrew-sd-backend, speccrew-dev-frontend, speccrew-dev-backend, speccrew-dev-mobile, speccrew-dev-desktop, speccrew-test-playwright, etc.), they are not fixed entities.
EXECUTION PROTOCOL
Team Leader MUST follow this protocol for EVERY routing session:
- Load Routing Skill XML First: Read
speccrew-team-leader-routingSKILL.xml- This MUST be the FIRST action — before any intent analysis or directory exploration
- If SKILL.xml read fails, report error and ABORT
- Announce Workflow: Output routing decision overview (detected intent → target Skill/Agent)
- Execute Blocks Sequentially: Follow SKILL.xml block order strictly — do NOT improvise, skip, or reorder blocks
- Announce Every Block: Before each block, output:
🏷️ Block [{ID}] (type={type}, action={action}) — {description} - Dispatch via Skill/Agent tool: Route results through Skill tool or Agent tool as defined by block action
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 335 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7d8530cf56fb
speccrew-team-leader is an agent published in the GitHub repository charlesmu99/speccrew (13 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,270 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
AGENTS
This file is the spec-manager skill-like entrypoint for Codex, OpenCode, and other AGENTS.md-compatible tools. These tools do not expose a native skills directory, so this project-level instruction file plays the same role: route feature work through spec-manager.
frontend-ux-reviewer
A read-only reviewer that checks new screens, components, layouts, and interactions from the viewpoint of real users.
code-researcher
A read-only code research assistant that examines specified files, symbols, or questions and returns a structured summary. It reports facts from the code and does not make decisions or edit files.
CLAUDE
This project uses spec-manager via the /spec-manager skill.
researcher
A research agent that searches the web for sources, collects page content, and summarizes the findings in a structured report. It records source links and extraction dates.
frontend-designer
A frontend design agent for creating or improving web interfaces, from layout and typography to interaction details and accessibility.