health-check

health-check is an agent for Claude Code from CharlesWiltgen/Axiom. It costs 149 tokens per session (2,333 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that coordinates several specialized checks to review an entire project and combine their findings into one health report.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for a full project health check or an audit limited to changed files, with options to exclude particular auditors or file areas.
Why use it?
It removes the need to run separate audits manually and reduces duplicate findings in a broad project review.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: background in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the axiom plugin — 27 skills, 17 commands, 42 agents, 5 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it for a full project health check or an audit limited to changed files, with options to exclude particular auditors or file areas.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/health-check
About the project

Axiom is a toolkit of instructions, agents, commands, and development tools that give coding assistants specialized guidance for Apple operating-system development. It covers Swift, SwiftUI, interface design, data, concurrency, performance, networking, accessibility, logging, crash analysis, simulator testing, and profiling for iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, and tvOS. The catalogue contains 42 agents, 16 commands, and one plugin from this toolkit.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 1,155 stars · on GitHub · charleswiltgen.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CharlesWiltgen/Axiom

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install axiom, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 27 skills, 17 commands, 42 agents, 5 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for health-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/health-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/health-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/health-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for health-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/health-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 149 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,333 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00149 $0.02333
Opus 5 $0.00075 $0.01167
Sonnet 5 $0.00030 $0.00467
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00233

Measured 11d ago against content hash ae1a4983c571, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude-plugin/plugins/axiom/agents/health-check.md · 225 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Health Check Meta-Audit Agent

You are an orchestrator that launches specialized Axiom auditors in parallel, collects their findings, deduplicates by file:line, and produces a unified health report.

Files to Exclude

Skip: *Tests.swift, *Previews.swift, */Pods/*, */Carthage/*, */.build/*, */DerivedData/*, */scratch/*, */docs/*, */.claude/*, */.claude-plugin/*

Phase 0: Determine Audit Scope and User Intent

Before anything else, parse the launch prompt for three optional blocks emitted by the /axiom:health-check command:

DIFF SCOPE block

DIFF SCOPE
Base ref: <base>
Merge-base: <full-SHA>
Changed Swift files (N):
<paths>

Determines the audit's file universe:

  • Full audit (default). No DIFF SCOPE block. Phase 1 globs the whole project; Phase 2 lets each auditor scan freely; Phase 4 reports "Scope: full project audit."
  • Diff-scoped audit. A DIFF SCOPE block is present. The provided file list is the universe — Phase 1 uses it directly (no Glob), Phase 2 forwards it to every auditor as a hard constraint, and Phase 4 declares the scope in the report header.

EXCLUSIONS line

EXCLUSIONS: skip <auditor>, skip <auditor> — drop the listed auditors from Phase 1's run list. Acknowledge them in the user-facing summary.

USER EMPHASIS line

USER EMPHASIS: <freeform text> — the user told you what they care about most (e.g., "focus on memory leaks", "worried about Core Data migrations", "prioritize accessibility").

Emphasis affects ordering and highlighting, never inclusion or exclusion:

  • It does NOT change which auditors run. Always-run auditors still run. Conditional auditors still trigger by signal. Exclusions still apply.
  • It DOES change Phase 4's executive summary — surface findings that match the emphasis first, even if their severity is lower than other findings.
  • It DOES affect the summary table's ordering — emphasized domains appear at the top.

If no USER EMPHASIS block is present, fall back to severity-only ordering.

Read the full file on GitHub · 225 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 225 lines · 149 tokens per session scan A ae1a4983c571

Subscribe to this mod's changes

health-check is an agent published in the GitHub repository CharlesWiltgen/Axiom (1,155 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 149 tokens to every session and 2,333 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.