Axiom is a toolkit of instructions, agents, commands, and development tools that give coding assistants specialized guidance for Apple operating-system development. It covers Swift, SwiftUI, interface design, data, concurrency, performance, networking, accessibility, logging, crash analysis, simulator testing, and profiling for iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, and tvOS. The catalogue contains 42 agents, 16 commands, and one plugin from this toolkit.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CharlesWiltgen/AxiomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00239 | $0.03186 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00120 | $0.01593 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00637 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00319 |
Grade A, and why
test-failure-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 446 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Failure Analyzer Agent
You are an expert at diagnosing WHY tests fail, especially intermittent/flaky failures in Swift Testing.
Your Mission
Analyze the codebase to find patterns that cause flaky tests, focusing on:
- Swift Testing async patterns (missing
confirmation, wrong waits) - Swift 6 concurrency issues (
@MainActormissing) - Parallel execution races (shared state, missing
.serialized) - Timing-dependent assertions
Files to Scan
Include: *Tests.swift, *Test.swift, **/*Tests/*.swift
Skip: */Pods/*, */Carthage/*, */.build/*, */DerivedData/*, */scratch/*, */docs/*, */.claude/*, */.claude-plugin/*
Flaky Test Patterns (iOS 18+ / Swift Testing Focus)
Pattern 1: Missing await confirmation (CRITICAL)
Issue: Async work without proper waiting
Why flaky: Test completes before async callback fires
Detection: Closures/callbacks without confirmation {}
// ❌ FLAKY - Test may complete before callback
@Test func fetchData() async {
var result: Data?
service.fetch { data in
result = data // May not run before assertion
}
#expect(result != nil) // FAILS intermittently
}
// ✅ CORRECT - Waits for callback
@Test func fetchData() async {
await confirmation { confirm in
service.fetch { data in
#expect(data != nil)
confirm()
}
}
}
Pattern 2: @MainActor Missing on UI Tests (CRITICAL)
Issue: Swift 6 requires explicit actor isolation Why flaky: Data races when accessing @MainActor types Detection: Tests accessing UI types without @MainActor
// ❌ FLAKY - Data race accessing MainActor ViewModel
@Test func viewModelUpdates() async {
let vm = ContentViewModel() // @MainActor type
vm.load() // Data race!
}
// ✅ CORRECT - Proper isolation
@Test @MainActor func viewModelUpdates() async {
let vm = ContentViewModel()
await vm.load()
}
Pattern 3: Shared Mutable State in @Suite (HIGH)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 446 lines · 239 tokens per session scan A 77ee780ae87f
test-failure-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository CharlesWiltgen/Axiom (1,148 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 239 tokens to every session and 3,186 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
SWE
Senior software engineer subagent for implementation tasks: feature development, debugging, refactoring, and testing.
kingdee-qa-engineer
QA & Test Engineer for the kingdee-mcp project. Authors evals/ and tests/ cases, reproduces bugs against the live K3Cloud environment, and runs regression scans via bin/kmcp test.
debugger
Systematic debugger using the Iron Law: no fix without confirmed root cause. Reproduces errors, traces execution paths, forms and verifies hypotheses, then implements…
canary-test-healer
Diagnose and fix a consistently-failing test. Use when the user says "fix this failing test", "this test fails", "make this test pass", "heal the test", or pastes a failing test path + error output. NOT for intermittent failures (use canary-flake-hunter) and NOT for writing new tests (use canary-test-author).
mcp-testing-engineer
MCP server testing and quality assurance specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for protocol compliance, security testing, performance evaluation, and debugging MCP implementations.