test-failure-analyzer

test-failure-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from CharlesWiltgen/Axiom. It costs 239 tokens per session (3,186 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent for finding why Swift Testing tests fail intermittently, especially tests involving asynchronous work, Swift 6 concurrency, or parallel execution.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate flaky iOS or Swift tests, missing waits, incorrect main-thread handling, race conditions, or tests that need serialized execution.
Why use it?
It identifies timing and shared-state problems that can make tests pass on one run and fail on another, including differences between local runs and continuous integration.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: background in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; positional $N argument.

Part of the axiom plugin — 27 skills, 17 commands, 42 agents, 5 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to investigate flaky iOS or Swift tests, missing waits, incorrect main-thread handling, race conditions, or tests that need serialized execution.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer
About the project

Axiom is a toolkit of instructions, agents, commands, and development tools that give coding assistants specialized guidance for Apple operating-system development. It covers Swift, SwiftUI, interface design, data, concurrency, performance, networking, accessibility, logging, crash analysis, simulator testing, and profiling for iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, and tvOS. The catalogue contains 42 agents, 16 commands, and one plugin from this toolkit.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 1,148 stars · on GitHub · charleswiltgen.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CharlesWiltgen/Axiom

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install axiom, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 27 skills, 17 commands, 42 agents, 5 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-failure-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/test-failure-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 239 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,186 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00239 $0.03186
Opus 5 $0.00120 $0.01593
Sonnet 5 $0.00048 $0.00637
Haiku 4.5 $0.00024 $0.00319

Measured 8d ago against content hash 77ee780ae87f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-failure-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude-plugin/plugins/axiom/agents/test-failure-analyzer.md · 446 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 446 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test Failure Analyzer Agent

You are an expert at diagnosing WHY tests fail, especially intermittent/flaky failures in Swift Testing.

Your Mission

Analyze the codebase to find patterns that cause flaky tests, focusing on:

  • Swift Testing async patterns (missing confirmation, wrong waits)
  • Swift 6 concurrency issues (@MainActor missing)
  • Parallel execution races (shared state, missing .serialized)
  • Timing-dependent assertions

Files to Scan

Include: *Tests.swift, *Test.swift, **/*Tests/*.swift Skip: */Pods/*, */Carthage/*, */.build/*, */DerivedData/*, */scratch/*, */docs/*, */.claude/*, */.claude-plugin/*

Flaky Test Patterns (iOS 18+ / Swift Testing Focus)

Pattern 1: Missing await confirmation (CRITICAL)

Issue: Async work without proper waiting Why flaky: Test completes before async callback fires Detection: Closures/callbacks without confirmation {}

// ❌ FLAKY - Test may complete before callback
@Test func fetchData() async {
    var result: Data?
    service.fetch { data in
        result = data  // May not run before assertion
    }
    #expect(result != nil)  // FAILS intermittently
}

// ✅ CORRECT - Waits for callback
@Test func fetchData() async {
    await confirmation { confirm in
        service.fetch { data in
            #expect(data != nil)
            confirm()
        }
    }
}

Pattern 2: @MainActor Missing on UI Tests (CRITICAL)

Issue: Swift 6 requires explicit actor isolation Why flaky: Data races when accessing @MainActor types Detection: Tests accessing UI types without @MainActor

// ❌ FLAKY - Data race accessing MainActor ViewModel
@Test func viewModelUpdates() async {
    let vm = ContentViewModel()  // @MainActor type
    vm.load()  // Data race!
}

// ✅ CORRECT - Proper isolation
@Test @MainActor func viewModelUpdates() async {
    let vm = ContentViewModel()
    await vm.load()
}

Pattern 3: Shared Mutable State in @Suite (HIGH)

Read the full file on GitHub · 446 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 446 lines · 239 tokens per session scan A 77ee780ae87f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-failure-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository CharlesWiltgen/Axiom (1,148 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 239 tokens to every session and 3,186 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories