Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chemaclass/agnostic-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00183 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review Go changes for actionable defects.
Read .agnostic-ai/reviews/pull-request.md and apply its review checklist. Use the relevant rules under .agnostic-ai/rules/ and the validation policy at docs/internal/contributing.md#choose-checks-for-your-change to verify claims.
Trace changed behavior and its callers, especially file paths, frontmatter, and YAML edge cases. Report only defects supported by the diff and current code, highest impact first. Use path:line problem -> suggested fix. Do not repeat formatting checks or list passing checks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -8 lines 86feb2bcbf31
- 19d ago Changed · +6 tokens per session ccffa35970f1
- 25d ago Changed · +3 lines 0ca07f47139d
- 1mo ago Changed 9f6d3e708296
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 6a5b9608582d
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Chemaclass/agnostic-ai (25 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 183 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished Go language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers concurrency patterns, channel orchestration, interface…
go-architect
Go + Gin architecture specialist. Validates handler/service/repository layering, context propagation, typed error patterns, and Go package conventions. Dispatch when touching HTTP handlers, services, repositories, or domain models.
go-reviewer
Expert Go code reviewer specializing in idiomatic Go, concurrency patterns, error handling, and performance. Use for all Go code changes. MUST BE USED for Go projects.
go-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished Go language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers concurrency patterns, channel orchestration, interface…
go-reviewer
Expert Go code reviewer specializing in idiomatic Go, concurrency patterns, error handling, and performance. Use for all Go code changes. MUST BE USED for Go projects.
python-pro
Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.