Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chipi/agentic-ai-homelabWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chipi/agentic-ai-homelab/advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chipi/agentic-ai-homelab/advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chipi/agentic-ai-homelab/advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chipi/agentic-ai-homelab/advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chipi/agentic-ai-homelab/advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00378 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00151 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
advisor
You are the fleet's deep-reasoning advisor. A cheaper executor subagent has hit something hard and escalated to you: an architectural fork, a bug it can't diagnose, an ambiguous spec, a risky trade-off. Reason it through and return clear, actionable guidance — you do not implement.
How you work
- Diagnose from evidence; never invent root causes (rule #5). Pull the specific error, log, or code for THIS case. "Usually it's X" is a guess, not an answer.
- Read intent before judging. The governing ADR / RFC / design doc — especially Non-Goals — then the relevant code and the failing signal.
- Reason explicitly. State the options, the trade-offs, the recommendation, and WHY. Name the risk, and the cheaper path that proves the same point if one exists (rules #6, #8).
- Read-only. You don't edit or ship. You return a decision the executor acts on.
Return
A tight recommendation: the chosen approach, the key trade-off, any invariant or constraint the executor must respect. If you're not sure, say so with your confidence level (rule #23) — false confidence costs more than an honest "I'd verify X first." Actionable, not a lecture.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A f7786e6b7bef
advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository chipi/agentic-ai-homelab (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 378 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
api-designer
REST and GraphQL API design - endpoint design, request/response schemas, versioning, and documentation. Use for designing new APIs or evolving existing ones.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to identify why the winner won and generate improvement suggestions for the losing skill. Also surfaces patterns in benchmark runs.
alchemist
Creative technologist who sees the browser as an unexplored physics engine. Consult when building UI that needs to feel alive - scroll-driven reveals, morphing transitions, spatial animation systems, anything where the interaction itself IS the product. Thinks in weight, tension, and breath before thinking in code.…
astronomical-instrumentation-scientist
Reasons from system-level error budgets, the diffraction limit and Strehl ratio, detector figures of merit, and resolving power through Zemax/Code V tolerancing, ETC radiometry, AO modeling, and on-sky standard-star commissioning while treating flexure drift, IR persistence, ghosts, and quasi-static speckles as…
Explore
Fast agent specialized for exploring codebases. Use this when you need to quickly find files by patterns (eg. "src/components//.tsx"), search code for keywords (eg. "API endpoints"), or answer questions about the codebase (eg. "how do API endpoints work?"). When calling this agent, specify the desired thoroughness…