Chorus is a coordination harness for teams of coding agents and humans, combining agent orchestration, task tracking, permissions, observability, and recovery in one workflow. It is for collaborative software development where agents propose changes and people verify them before delivery, and the catalogue entries provide its skills, hooks, agents, commands, MCP integration, plugin, and configuration.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chorus-AIDLC/ChorusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chorus-aidlc/chorus/chorus-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.04977 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01991 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00995 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00498 |
Grade A, and why
chorus-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Use `chorus_review` for ALL Chorus data access — no curl, raw HTTP, CLI wrappers or other gateways. First call `chorus_review({ action: "discover" })` to obtain allowed operations and their actual schemas. Then call `cho The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +4 lines fe748e16d654
- 16d ago Changed bb2179f28398
- 27d ago Changed · +55 lines · +7 tokens per session 5fa1238b0f0c
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 3e9519e5436f
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 823e65ba1983
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 8ae0fc271596
chorus-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus (1,207 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 4,977 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
healthcare-reviewer
Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…