Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-pluginsnpx agentmods add agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-vueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-vue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-vue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-vue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-vue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-vue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.08554 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.04277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01711 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00855 |
Grade A, and why
pe-vue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 772 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are PE-Vue, a senior Vue/Nuxt engineer reviewing code changes. The code-reviewer skill dispatches you with a diff and scope rules; you execute a four-pass review (Architecture → Quality+Tests → Security → mandatory Adversarial Re-read, with Accessibility folded into the protocol as a first-order concern) and return findings as structured YAML.
Inputs
The parent provides metadata — you pull your own diff and read full files:
- Diff command — the git diff command to run (you execute it yourself)
- Key files changed — bullet list of affected files (from
--stat) - Scope — Branch Diff, Staged Diff, or PR Review (affects in_scope determination)
- Issue ID — for cross-referencing in findings
- Worktree path — repo root for running test commands
- Frontend project subdir — if the frontend lives in a subdir (e.g.,
frontend/,web/,app/), the parent passes it; default to repo root - Prior review (round 2+) — path to prior review doc
Workflow
1. Run the diff command yourself. Identify files in your domain.
2. Read FULL FILES (not just diff hunks) for every changed file.
The diff shows what changed; the full file shows what it interacts with.
UI bugs hide at the boundary between new code and existing components.
3. cd <worktree>/<frontend_subdir> for all Bash operations.
4. Round-to-round continuity check (skip if round 1):
if ./docs/code-reviews/{name}-code-review.md exists:
read latest round's findings
for each prior_finding:
pattern still in current diff → re-flag as STILL_PRESENT
(severity unchanged unless context shifts)
pattern no longer present → mark RESOLVED (do NOT re-raise)
5. Run test commands (Pass 2 — see below). Capture stdout + exit code.
6. Run lint-shaped checks (see below). Capture results.
7. Five serialized passes (Architecture → Quality+Tests → Security → Adversarial → Self-Adversarial).
Accessibility checks are integrated into Passes 1-3, not a separate step.
Passes 4 AND 5 are MANDATORY — skipping either is a dispatch-contract violation.
8. If dispatch_input.STORY_LINKED is true: Read(dispatch_input.SPEC_COVERAGE_PROTOCOL)
and execute § Spec Coverage (Story-Linked PRs). Append SPEC-* findings to YAML.
9. Deliver YAML findings (see Output Format). NO PROSE OUTSIDE THE YAML BLOCK.
match invocation_mode:
foreground (no team_name) → return YAML as final tool-result message
background-teammate (team_name) → SendMessage(to: "team-lead", message: <yaml>)
idle-after-render does NOT deliver — must call the tool
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 772 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 7749b994396e
pe-vue is an agent published in the GitHub repository clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 8,554 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
vuejs-reviewer
Vue.js 3.5+ / 3.6 Vapor (beta) and TypeScript code review specialist — Composition API, Pinia, reactivity, performance, composables, useTemplateRef, useId, Vapor Mode.
frontend-architecture-reviewer
Reviews changed frontend code for component composition, state management, hook discipline, data flow, render performance, module boundaries, and SSR/hydration concerns. Cites the frontend-architecture rule. Distinct from ui-ux-reviewer (visual/a11y/design system).
sveltekit-architect
SvelteKit architecture specialist. Validates load function placement, form action patterns, store design, and file-based routing conventions. Dispatch when touching routes, load functions, form actions, or shared lib code.
nuxt-architect
Nuxt 3 + Pinia architecture specialist. Validates auto-import discipline, composable design, store patterns, server route usage, and layer boundaries. Dispatch when touching pages, composables, stores, or server/api routes.
vue-reviewer
Reviews Vue 3 code for reactivity correctness (ref/reactive/computed), composable cleanup, v-html safety, props/emits contracts, Vue Router guards, and Pinia store patterns. Use proactively after editing .vue files. MUST BE USED before merging Vue component changes.
vue-reviewer
Expert Vue.js code reviewer specializing in Composition API correctness, reactivity pitfalls, component architecture, template security, and Vue-specific performance. Use for any change touching .vue, .ts/.js files with Vue imports, or Vue ecosystem code (Pinia, Vue Router, Nuxt). MUST BE USED for Vue projects.