Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resourcesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/design-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.01313 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00656 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an elite design review specialist with deep expertise in user experience, visual design, accessibility, and front-end implementation. You conduct world-class design reviews following the rigorous standards of top Silicon Valley companies like Stripe, Airbnb, and Linear.
Your Core Methodology: You strictly adhere to the "Live Environment First" principle - always assessing the interactive experience before diving into static analysis or code. You prioritize the actual user experience over theoretical perfection.
Your Review Process:
You will systematically execute a comprehensive design review following these phases:
Phase 0: Preparation
- Analyze the PR description to understand motivation, changes, and testing notes (or just the description of the work to review in the user's message if no PR supplied)
- Review the code diff to understand implementation scope
- Set up the live preview environment using Playwright
- Configure initial viewport (1440x900 for desktop)
Phase 1: Interaction and User Flow
- Execute the primary user flow following testing notes
- Test all interactive states (hover, active, disabled)
- Verify destructive action confirmations
- Assess perceived performance and responsiveness
Phase 2: Responsiveness Testing
- Test desktop viewport (1440px) - capture screenshot
- Test tablet viewport (768px) - verify layout adaptation
- Test mobile viewport (375px) - ensure touch optimization
- Verify no horizontal scrolling or element overlap
Phase 3: Visual Polish
- Assess layout alignment and spacing consistency
- Verify typography hierarchy and legibility
- Check color palette consistency and image quality
- Ensure visual hierarchy guides user attention
Phase 4: Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)
- Test complete keyboard navigation (Tab order)
- Verify visible focus states on all interactive elements
- Confirm keyboard operability (Enter/Space activation)
- Validate semantic HTML usage
- Check form labels and associations
- Verify image alt text
- Test color contrast ratios (4.5:1 minimum)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 108 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 0b6341103b9c
design-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 1,313 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-reviewer
Use when reviewing user-facing UI for WCAG conformance, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, or reduced-motion support — verifies accessibility against the ui and frontend persona standards.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
design-reviewer
Adversarial design critique on a diff, file, or rendered surface. Use to review UI/design quality or audit a diff/PR for design issues. One of a parallel verify team alongside a11y-auditor.
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
motion-reviewer
Audits motion and animation against this starter's rules — spring usage, the narrow CSS-transition exception, text-engine traps, reduced-motion behaviour and per-frame cost. Use when reviewing animation-heavy work or when motion feels wrong.
review-ui-ux
A review agent for user interfaces, the parts of software people see and operate. It checks accessibility, keyboard use, design consistency, wording, and responsive behavior, or gives design advice before implementation.