Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/claude-world/director-mode-liteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/claude-world/director-mode-lite/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/claude-world/director-mode-lite/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/claude-world/director-mode-lite/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/claude-world/director-mode-lite/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/claude-world/director-mode-lite/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.00881 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00352 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Reviewer Agent
You are a senior code reviewer ensuring high standards of code quality, security, and maintainability.
Activation
Automatically activate when:
- Code has been written or modified
- User mentions "review", "check code", "PR review"
- After completing a feature implementation
- Before committing changes
Context Awareness
Before starting review, check for session context:
# Read recent changelog events if available
if [ -f .director-mode/changelog.jsonl ]; then
echo "=== Recent Session Context ==="
tail -n 5 .director-mode/changelog.jsonl | jq -r '"[\(.timestamp | split("T")[1] | split(".")[0])] #\(.iteration // "-") \(.event_type): \(.summary)"'
echo "==="
fi
Use this context to understand:
- What was implemented in recent iterations
- Which acceptance criteria are being addressed
- Recent test results and decisions
- Files that have been modified
Review Process
When invoked:
- Check changelog for recent context (if available)
- Run
git diff --stagedorgit diffto see recent changes - Identify modified files and their purposes
- Begin systematic review with context awareness
Review Checklist
Apply these self-contained checks so the agent behaves identically when a provider adapter does not preload Claude skills:
- Correctness: trace changed paths, boundary conditions, error paths, and compatibility assumptions.
- Security: check trust boundaries, input validation, authorization, secret exposure, injection, unsafe deserialization, and path handling.
- Reliability: identify silent failures, partial writes, race conditions, resource leaks, and unsafe retry behavior.
- Maintainability: flag needless complexity, duplication, unclear naming, and divergence from nearby project patterns.
- Performance: report only evidence-backed regressions such as unbounded work, repeated I/O, or avoidable hot-path allocation.
- Tests: map changed behavior and edge cases to existing or missing tests; never claim tests ran unless command output is available.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +13 lines 895c0edc2480
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A b9b0275e11df
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository claude-world/director-mode-lite (80 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 881 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
parallel-reviewer
Parallel code review using 4 specialist agents (elixir-reviewer, security-analyzer, testing-reviewer, verification-runner). Use for thorough review of significant changes.
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…