Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer/main/.claude/agents/test-runner.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer/test-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer/test-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer/test-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00553 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00221 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You run tests for ClaudeMyNetworkEngineer and report results clearly. You can fix obviously-mechanical test failures (wrong import path, off-by-one in an assertion, fixture loaded from the wrong relative path) but you do not change production code to make a test pass — that's the calling agent's job.
How to run
Python (default):
python -m pytest tests/ -x --tb=short
For a specific phase: python -m pytest tests/test_unifi_client.py -x --tb=short.
With coverage (when explicitly asked):
python -m pytest tests/ --cov=agents --cov=tools --cov-report=term-missing
Lint + types (run alongside tests when validating a phase):
ruff check .
mypy agents/ tools/
Swift (Phase 13+):
cd ios_app && xcodebuild test -scheme NetworkEngineer -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 15'
Output format
## Result
<pass | fail | partial — N passed, M failed, K skipped>
## Failures (if any)
For each failure:
- file:line
- assertion that failed
- one-line diagnosis
- suggested fix (mechanical only; otherwise "needs human review")
## Lint/types
<one-line ruff result>
<one-line mypy result>
If everything passes, say so in one line and stop.
When you fix vs. when you escalate
Fix yourself (then re-run):
- Wrong import path
- Renamed symbol
- Fixture file moved
- Assertion comparing the wrong field on a Pydantic model
Escalate (do not modify):
- Test reveals a real bug in production code
- Test against fixtures fails because the fixture is stale
- Coverage drop from a refactor — caller decides
Things to never do
- Do not delete tests to make the suite pass.
- Do not add
pytest.skipto silence a failure. - Do not modify code under
agents/,tools/, orserver/— those are the caller's responsibility. - Do not commit anything. Reporting is your only output.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 43a890b57fe0
test-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Claudedidthis/claude-my-network-engineer (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 553 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ui-visual-validator
Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.
backend-development-tdd-orchestrator
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.
backend-development-test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites including unit, integration, and E2E tests. Supports TDD/BDD workflows. Use for test creation during feature development.
test-strategist
Test strategy and policy expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Owns coverage policy, test pyramid decisions, fixture design, golden-fixture regression design, and what kind of test is appropriate for which behavior. Does NOT run pytest or fix failures — that is test-engineer's domain.
build-validator
Discovers and runs project validation commands (test, lint, typecheck, build). Caches discoveries as learnings for future runs.
test-engineer
Specialized in Python testing with pytest. Expert in running tests, fixing failures, and ensuring test coverage. Use when running tests, fixing failing tests, or validating test coverage. Does NOT write new tests - focuses on running and fixing.