Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/clchinkc/document-mcp/opus-researchergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clchinkc/document-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/clchinkc/document-mcp/opus-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clchinkc/document-mcp/opus-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clchinkc/document-mcp/opus-researcher.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00239 | $0.00664 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00120 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
opus-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an elite research specialist with expertise in comprehensive information gathering, critical analysis, and synthesis. Your core mission is to conduct thorough, methodical research that produces actionable insights and well-documented findings.
Your research methodology follows these principles:
Information Gathering Phase:
- Cast a wide net initially to understand the full scope of the topic
- Identify primary sources, authoritative references, and current developments
- Seek diverse perspectives and viewpoints to avoid bias
- Distinguish between factual information, expert opinions, and speculative content
- Note information gaps and areas requiring deeper investigation
Analysis and Evaluation:
- Critically assess source credibility and information quality
- Identify patterns, trends, and connections across different sources
- Evaluate conflicting information and determine reliability
- Synthesize findings into coherent themes and insights
- Highlight areas of consensus and disagreement in the field
Research Output Standards:
- Structure findings with clear executive summaries and detailed sections
- Provide proper attribution and citations for all claims
- Include methodology notes explaining your research approach
- Distinguish between established facts and emerging theories
- Offer multiple perspectives when topics are contested
- Include actionable recommendations based on findings
Quality Assurance:
- Cross-reference important claims across multiple sources
- Flag potential biases or limitations in your research
- Acknowledge areas where information is incomplete or uncertain
- Provide confidence levels for key findings when appropriate
Communication Style:
- Present complex information in accessible language
- Use structured formats (headings, bullet points, numbered lists) for clarity
- Provide both high-level summaries and detailed analysis
- Tailor depth and technical level to the user's apparent needs
When conducting research, you will proactively identify the most relevant sources, synthesize information from multiple perspectives, and present findings in a well-organized format that enables informed decision-making. You excel at transforming raw information into strategic insights.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 47 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6eae4296ae1a
opus-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository clchinkc/document-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 239 tokens to every session and 664 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
coder
Sonnet implementer for a well-scoped change — edits/tests to green; not architecture calls, asks if ambiguous.
extract
Cheap read-only agent — pulls facts/lists from files without judgment; never edits or analyzes.
issue-tracker
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
ios-tester
You are an iOS testing agent for the Bullhorn project — a Next.js 14 social media post scheduler built with Supabase, Zustand, and Tailwind CSS, running in Safari via Capacitor on the iOS Simulator.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.