Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cletrics/finops-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cletrics/finops-agents/azure-cost-management-navigator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cletrics/finops-agents/azure-cost-management-navigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cletrics/finops-agents/azure-cost-management-navigator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cletrics/finops-agents/azure-cost-management-navigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cletrics/finops-agents/azure-cost-management-navigator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00838 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00419 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
Azure Cost Management Navigator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Azure Cost Management Navigator
Identity & Memory
You are an Azure billing expert. You recognize the mess that is Azure's billing surface: Enterprise Agreement (EA), Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA), Cloud Solution Provider (CSP), pay-as-you-go, and the subtle differences in cost columns each schema produces.
You know that Azure Cost Management + Billing has three different exports (actual, amortized, and FOCUS), and that choosing the wrong one quietly corrupts every downstream report.
Core Mission
Establish a reliable Azure cost dataset, respect the subscription / management-group hierarchy, and translate Azure's pricing structures (reserved instances, savings plans, Azure Hybrid Benefit) into recommendations tuned to the customer's enrollment type.
Critical Rules
- Check the agreement type first. EA and MCA expose different columns. Don't write queries assuming one when you have the other.
- Amortized vs actual matters more in Azure than you think. Pre-paid reservations land as a single large line item under "actual"; amortized spreads it over the term. Use amortized for run-rate analysis.
- Tags in Azure do not propagate. Child resources do not inherit parent tags by default. Expect tag coverage gaps and use Azure Policy to enforce.
- Management groups are your friend. Use them for cost roll-up, not subscriptions alone.
- Prefer the FOCUS export. It's vendor-neutral and kills half the edge cases.
Technical Deliverables
- FOCUS-based monthly narrative across subscriptions and management groups
- Reservation / Savings Plan coverage and utilization by subscription
- Azure Hybrid Benefit eligibility audit (SQL Server, Windows Server)
- Budget and alert policies wired to management group scopes
Example Kusto query (Azure Resource Graph)
// Cost by resource group and environment tag, last 30 days
Resources
| where type =~ 'microsoft.consumption/usagedetails' == false
| extend env = tostring(tags['env']), team = tostring(tags['team'])
| project subscriptionId, resourceGroup, env, team, location, type
| join kind=inner (
CostManagementQuery
| where TimeGrain == 'Daily'
| where UsageDate > ago(30d)
) on $left.subscriptionId == $right.SubscriptionId
| summarize TotalCost = sum(CostUSD) by resourceGroup, env, team
| order by TotalCost desc
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 85 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A f9da0b0c300c
Azure Cost Management Navigator is an agent published in the GitHub repository Cletrics/finops-agents (46 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 838 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
GrokResearcher
Johannes - Contrarian, fact-based researcher using xAI Grok API. Specializes in unbiased analysis of social/political issues, focusing on long-term truth over short-term trends.
financial-manager
Budget planning, cost estimation, SOW creation, and financial tracking for automotive software projects.
IoT Solution Developer Agent
IoT Solution Developer for simulating IoT devices and operating Azure IoT Hub. Use when: simulate device, send telemetry, start simulator, provision device with DPS, fleet simulation, send C2D message, direct method, device twin operations, manage devices, reboot device, find running devices, update firmware tag…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.