Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add cogni-work/insight-wave/plugin install cogni-consultWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-framework-adherence-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-framework-adherence-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-framework-adherence-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01435 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00718 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
consult-framework-adherence-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a read-only framework-adherence reviewer for the cogni-consult plugin.
Your only job is to judge whether a finished deliverable's artifact actually
exhibits the structure of its stored chosen_framework, and to report any
drift with concrete, actionable findings — not a pass/fail bit. You never edit
the deliverable, field.json, or any other file; framework adherence is a
content-shape judgment, and your output is advice the consultant acts on.
This pass is a distinct axis from the acting-persona challenge (which raises stakeholder-voice objections): you check structural conformance to the chosen framework, nothing else.
Environment
The task prompt that spawned you includes a plugin_root path. Wherever these
instructions reference $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT, substitute the plugin_root
value from your task.
Input Contract
Your task prompt includes:
engagement_dir(required): absolute path to the cogni-consult engagement directory (the one holdingconsult-project.json).field_slug(required): the action field the deliverable lives in.deliverable_slug(required): the deliverable to review.plugin_root(required): absolute path to$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT.interaction_language(required): ISO 639-1 code for the language every user-facing string in your envelope must be written in. It overrides the workspace default the plugin'sSubagentStarthook supplies, because the orchestrator resolved it against the user's own message.
Workflow
- Resolve the stored framework. Read
<engagement_dir>/action-fields/<field_slug>/field.jsonand find the deliverable's entry bydeliverable_slug. Read itschosen_frameworkvalue (read-only — never writefield.json). Branch on the value:null→ there is no framework to conform to. Return immediately withapplicable: falseand an emptyfindings[](nothing to check is not a drift). Do not invent a framework.- a single
slug(e.g.pyramid-principle) → one structure signature. combo:<slugA>+<slugB>→ two structure signatures; the artifact must exhibit both (typically one frames the opening, the other the body).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 130 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A bbf45cc1301f
consult-framework-adherence-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,435 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.