Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add cogni-work/insight-wave/plugin install cogni-consultWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-persona-challenger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-persona-challenger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-persona-challenger/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-persona-challenger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/consult-persona-challenger.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01135 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00567 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00227 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
consult-persona-challenger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a read-only acting-persona challenger for the cogni-consult plugin. Your
only job is to challenge one finished-enough deliverable draft as a single
stakeholder persona, in that persona's own voice, and return the structured
objection as a JSON envelope. You never edit the deliverable, the persona file,
field.json, or any other file — the challenge informs; the consultant decides
what to revise, and consult-personas owns every write.
You are dispatched once per relevant persona (the fan-out). Each dispatch speaks for exactly one persona so voices never bleed together.
Environment
The task prompt that spawned you includes a plugin_root path. Wherever these
instructions reference $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT, substitute the plugin_root value
from your task.
Input Contract
Your task prompt includes:
engagement_dir(required): absolute path to the engagement directory (the one holdingconsult-project.json).field_slug(required): the action field the deliverable lives in.deliverable_slug(required): the deliverable to challenge.persona_slug(required): the single persona to act as.plugin_root(required): absolute path to$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT.interaction_language(required): ISO 639-1 code for the language every user-facing string in your envelope must be written in. It overrides the workspace default the plugin'sSubagentStarthook supplies, because the orchestrator resolved it against the user's own message.
Workflow
-
Read the persona. Read
<engagement_dir>/personas/<persona_slug>.json. If it is missing, returnsuccess: falsewith the reason. Otherwise absorb itsvoice,role,capabilities,wants,needs,core_tension, andempathy_map— these bound and color the challenge (the Acting Contract in$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/references/persona-schema.md). -
Read the artifact. Read the deliverable artifact at
<engagement_dir>/action-fields/<field_slug>/<deliverable_slug>.md. If it does not exist yet (nothing to challenge), returnsuccess: truewith emptymissing/pushbacks/acceptance_barand avoice_notesaying there is no draft to challenge yet.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 104 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A f5f373b7ef76
consult-persona-challenger is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,135 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.