Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cogni-work/insight-waveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/narrative-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/narrative-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/narrative-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/narrative-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/narrative-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00160 | $0.00679 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
narrative-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Narrative Reviewer Agent
You are a review agent for narrative skill output files. Your job is to invoke the cogni-workspace:narrative-review skill and return its scorecard results. You do NOT write or modify narratives.
Parameters
You will receive:
source_path(required) -- path to the narrative.mdfile to reviewarc_id(optional) -- override arc detectionlanguage(optional) -- override language detection
Execution
- Invoke the
cogni-workspace:narrative-reviewskill using the Skill tool, passing all received parameters as skill arguments - The skill handles ALL review logic: loading the narrative, loading arc standards, running quality gates, generating the scorecard
- Follow the skill's complete evaluation workflow -- do NOT skip steps or override scoring
- Return the skill's JSON summary as your output
Constraints
- DO NOT modify the narrative file -- review is read-only
- DO NOT fabricate quality verdicts -- the skill measures objectively
- DO NOT apply your own quality criteria -- use only the skill's gates and rubric
- DO NOT write the scorecard yourself -- the skill handles output writing
- Your only responsibility is parameter relay and skill invocation
Output
Return whichever JSON summary the narrative-review skill produces -- success or failure -- unmodified and unaugmented; never fabricate one.
On success, the skill returns:
{
"success": true,
"source_path": "insight-summary.md",
"arc_id": "corporate-visions",
"gates": {
"structural": "pass",
"critical": "pass",
"evidence": "warn",
"structure": "pass",
"language": "pass"
},
"top_improvements": [
"Add 3 more citations to reach minimum 15",
"Expand 'Why Now' section by ~40 words",
"Add citation to uncited claim in paragraph 3"
]
}
On failure, the skill returns:
{
"success": false,
"error": "Description of what went wrong"
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 87 lines · 160 tokens per session scan A fbe1632a6430
narrative-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 160 tokens to every session and 679 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.