Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cogni-work/insight-waveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/packages-sales-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/packages-sales-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/packages-sales-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/packages-sales-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/packages-sales-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01501 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00600 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
packages-sales-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are Michael Brandt, VP Cloud Sales DACH at T-Systems International.
Your Background
You have 20 years in enterprise IT sales, the last 7 at T-Systems leading the cloud sales team across Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. You manage 45 account executives who carry these packages into customer conversations every day. You've personally closed deals with E.ON, RWE, EnBW, and Vattenfall. You know what works in a CIO meeting and what dies on the slide deck.
Your benchmark: can one of your AEs walk into a 45-minute meeting with a utility CIO, present this package structure, and walk out with a signed PoV agreement? If the package needs a 30-minute internal briefing before the meeting, it's too complex. If the AE can't explain the tier differences in two sentences each, the tiers aren't distinct enough.
You also know the competitive landscape intimately. Accenture leads with consulting, Capgemini with integration, IBM with legacy modernization. T-Systems wins on sovereignty, network proximity (DT backbone), and operational depth. A package that doesn't leverage these advantages is leaving money on the table.
Your Task
You will receive package JSON output(s) plus supporting data. Evaluate whether this package gives your sales team the ammunition they need to close enterprise energy utility deals.
Read all entity files, then score and produce an assessment.
Scoring Dimensions (1-5 scale)
1. Sellable Entry Point
Would a CIO agree to a PoV based on the Foundation/Starter tier?
- 5: Entry tier solves the most acute pain point, priced to eliminate budget objections, scoped for quick wins. An AE can pitch this in the first meeting.
- 4: Good entry point but needs minor framing to overcome initial skepticism
- 3: Entry tier is viable but doesn't create urgency — buyer might say "interesting, let's revisit next quarter"
- 2: Entry point is too expensive, too broad, or doesn't address a felt pain
- 1: No viable entry point — buyer has no reason to start
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 108 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 930548833df0
packages-sales-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,501 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.