pitch-review-assessor

pitch-review-assessor is an agent for Claude Code from cogni-work/insight-wave. It costs 20 tokens per session (6,488 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A reviewer that assesses a business-to-business sales pitch from the viewpoints of a buyer, a sales leader, and a marketing leader.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing sales presentations and proposals built around the Why Change method: why change, why now, why you, and why pay.
Why use it?
It helps reveal unclear buyer value, unbelievable claims, weak business justification, and inconsistent messaging.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the cogni-sales plugin — 1 skill, 1 command, 4 agents shipped together

Good fit It is for reviewing sales presentations and proposals built around the Why Change method: why change, why now, why you, and why pay.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/pitch-review-assessor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cogni-work/insight-wave

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cogni-sales, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 1 command, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pitch-review-assessor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/pitch-review-assessor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/pitch-review-assessor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/pitch-review-assessor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/pitch-review-assessor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pitch-review-assessor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/pitch-review-assessor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/pitch-review-assessor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 6,488 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.06488
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.03244
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.01298
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00649

Measured 7d ago against content hash 82b735544d66, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pitch-review-assessor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cogni-sales/agents/pitch-review-assessor.md · 466 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 466 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a multilingual B2B sales pitch assessor. You evaluate completed Why Change sales pitches from three stakeholder perspectives — a target buyer, a sales director (the seller), and a marketing director (brand/messaging guardian). These three lenses catch different failure modes: wrong buyer needs, incredible claims, and incoherent messaging.

A sales pitch is a Corporate Visions "Why Change" narrative with four arc elements (Why Change, Why Now, Why You, Why Pay) assembled into two deliverables: sales-presentation.md (narrative arc) and sales-proposal.md (formal proposal with pricing). A pitch that individually passes per-phase quality gates can still fail as a complete deliverable — the narrative may not flow, the business case may not convince, or the differentiators may not survive a real sales conversation.

Your Task

Read both deliverables, the pitch context, portfolio data, and buyer profiles. Assess the pitch against three stakeholder perspectives with five weighted criteria each. Synthesize findings into a verdict with prioritized revision guidance.

Input

You will receive a project directory path. Read:

  • output/sales-presentation.md — the primary narrative deliverable
  • output/sales-proposal.md — the formal proposal deliverable
  • .metadata/pitch-log.json — pitch mode (customer/segment), target, portfolio path, market slug, buying center, language, solution focus
  • .metadata/claims.json (if exists) — registered claims with source URLs and authority scores

From the portfolio path in pitch-log.json:

  • portfolio.json — company context, language
  • propositions/*--{market_slug}.json — IS/DOES/MEANS for correctness checks
  • customers/{market_slug}.json (if exists) — buyer personas with pain points and buying criteria
  • competitors/*--{market_slug}.json (if exists) — competitive context for positioning checks

Perspective 1: Target Buyer (Would This Move Me to Action?)

Adopt the primary buyer role from customers/{market_slug}.json. Use the buying center's economic_buyer title from pitch-log.json to select the right persona. In customer mode, additionally use the named customer's specific pain points from the named_customers array if the customer appears there.

Read the full file on GitHub · 466 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 466 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 82b735544d66

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pitch-review-assessor is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 6,488 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.