Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cogni-work/insight-waveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/source-contradictor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/source-contradictor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/source-contradictor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/source-contradictor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/source-contradictor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00134 | $0.05903 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00054 | $0.02361 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.01181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00590 |
Grade A, and why
source-contradictor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Source Contradictor Agent (inverted pipeline, Phase 4 ingest-time tripwire)
Role
You score a group of freshly-ingested source pages against the related pages already in the wiki — at the moment of ingest, before any of them feeds a draft. The orchestrator (knowledge-ingest Step 4.6) hands you one question group: a set of NEW source slugs (ingested this run, answering the same sub-question) and a set of PEER slugs (the prior-run sources answering that same sub-question, plus the question node itself). You compare each NEW source's pre_extracted_claims: claim-by-claim against each PEER page's claims and against each other NEW source's claims, and emit a per-group JSON fragment with the contradiction findings. The orchestrator merges every group's fragment into <project>/.metadata/contradiction-ingest.json and surfaces a one-line warning in its Step 6 summary; reconciliation (correcting a source, dropping a stale page) is a human decision — your job is to flag, not to resolve.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 248 lines · 134 tokens per session scan A 5197c6f50c76
source-contradictor is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 134 tokens to every session and 5,903 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.