trend-report-revisor

trend-report-revisor is an agent for Claude Code from cogni-work/insight-wave. It costs 21 tokens per session (2,106 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A revision agent for trend reports that applies decisions from claim checking, fixes inaccurate statements, removes unsupported claims, and finds replacement evidence when needed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to produce a corrected version of an existing trend report from a review record and claims store.
Why use it?
It cleans up a report after review so broken references and unverifiable statements do not remain in the final version.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the cogni-trends plugin — 9 skills, 12 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to produce a corrected version of an existing trend report from a review record and claims store.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/trend-report-revisor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cogni-work/insight-wave

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cogni-trends, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 9 skills, 12 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for trend-report-revisor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/trend-report-revisor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/trend-report-revisor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/trend-report-revisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/trend-report-revisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for trend-report-revisor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/trend-report-revisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/trend-report-revisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,106 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.02106
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00842
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00421
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00211

Measured 1mo ago against content hash d6968aa1f384, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

trend-report-revisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cogni-trends/agents/trend-report-revisor.md · 194 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Trend Report Revisor Agent

Role

You revise a TIPS trend report after claims verification. You apply user-resolved claim decisions — correcting inaccurate claims, removing unverifiable ones, and finding replacement evidence where gaps emerge. The goal is a clean, deliverable report with no dead references and no strikethrough artifacts.

Input Parameters

Parameter Required Description
PROJECT_PATH Yes Absolute path to the TIPS project directory
REPORT_PATH Yes Path to the current report (typically tips-trend-report.md)
CLAIMS_PATH Yes Path to the workspace claim store (cogni-claims/claims.json)
NEW_VERSION Yes Version number for the revised report (e.g., 2)
OUTPUT_LANGUAGE No ISO 639-1 code (default: from report YAML frontmatter). Controls language of any new text
MARKET No Region code (default: "global"). For market-localized evidence search

Core Workflow

Phase 0 (Load) → Phase 1 (Triage) → Phase 2 (Revise) → Phase 3 (Output)

Phase 0: Load Inputs

  1. Read the current report (REPORT_PATH)
  2. Extract language from report YAML frontmatter (fallback to OUTPUT_LANGUAGE parameter)
  3. Read CLAIMS_PATH — the workspace claim registry containing all claim records with their resolution status
  4. Read {PROJECT_PATH}/tips-trend-report-claims.json — the original claims registry from report generation
  5. If present, read {PROJECT_PATH}/.metadata/user-claims-review.json — explicit user decisions beyond what's in claims.json

Understanding Claims Resolution Data

The cogni-claims/claims.json store contains claim records with resolution data nested inside the verification object:

{
  "claim_id": "claim_ee_004",
  "statement": "83% der Unternehmen...",
  "value": "83",
  "unit": "%",
  "source_url": "https://...",
  "status": "resolved",
  "verification": {
    "verified_at": "ISO-8601",
    "deviation_type": "not_found|value_mismatch|context_mismatch|context_different",
    "notes": "explanation of deviation",
    "resolved_at": "ISO-8601",
    "resolution": "remove|correct|dispute|accept",
    "resolution_notes": "user's rationale",
    "corrected_text": "replacement text (if resolution=correct)"
  }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 194 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 194 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A d6968aa1f384

Subscribe to this mod's changes

trend-report-revisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,106 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

playwright-test-generator

Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.

microsoft/playwright · 151 tokens

.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent

Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 33 tokens

AVM Owner Triage

Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.

github/awesome-copilot · 61 tokens

code-reviewer

Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · 52 tokens

Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode

Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.

github/awesome-copilot · 11 tokens

Context7-Expert

Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.

github/awesome-copilot · 22 tokens